Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 15.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Men Masc. 2019 Apr 4;21(1):36–45. doi: 10.1037/men0000199

Table 2.

Model Coefficients for Direct and Indirect Effects of Male Role Norms on Aggression Through Thought Suppression.

	Thought Suppression			Trait Aggression					Alcohol-Related Aggression
	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	p	Indirect	CI	Coeff.	SE	p	Indirect	CI

Drinking Frequency	.01	.01	.103	.001	.003	.653	---	---	.01	.01	.074	---	---
Drinking Quantity	.07	.23	.773	−.04	.11	.729	---	---	−.01	.24	.968	---	---
Status	a .09	.07	.20	c‘ .02	.04	.640	ab .02	−.01, .04	c‘ −.06	.08	.414	ab .04	−.02, .10
Toughness	a .51	.12	< .001	c‘ .22	.06	<.001	ab .08	.04, .14	c‘ −.06	.14	.64	ab .21	.10, .34
Antifemininity	a −.03	.11	.788	c‘ .03	.06	.563	ab −.005	−.04, .03	c‘ .50	.12	< .001	ab −.01	−.12, .08
Thought Suppression	---	---	---	b .16	.03	>.001	---	---	b .40	.07	< .001	---	---
Constant	i_M 18.65	4.49	< .001	i_Y 4.56	2.31	.049			i_Y −9.95	4.98	.047
	R² = .15 F (5, 239) = 8.13, p < .001			R² = .25 F (6, 238) = 13.39, p < .001					R² = .23 F (6, 238) = 11.96, p < .001