Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jul 14;32(10):2001–2012. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01612

Table 1.

Results from exploratory classification analyses testing whether subjects’ trial-by-trial interpretations of ambiguous stimuli could be recovered from the pattern of activation in particular sets of brain regions.

Regions Left Right
Frontal t(23) = −0.229, p = 0.590, n.s. t(23) = −0.566, p = 0.711, n.s.
Insula t(23) = 0.732, p = 0.236, n.s. t(23) = 0.115, p = 0.455, n.s.
Temporal t(23) = 0.261, p = 0.398, n.s. t(23) = 1.734, p = 0.048, *
Parietal t(23) = 2.002, p = 0.029, * t(23) = 0.343, p = 0.367, n.s.
*

indicates classification accuracy that was significantly above chance at p < 0.05, uncorrected for multiple comparisons.