Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;79:50. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00573-9

Table 3.

Correlations between current PA level or type of PA and functional capacities and body composition, among women (n = 362)

Total PA level (min) Body & mind activities (min) Aerobic activities (min) Resistance activities (min)
P r P r p r p
BODY COMPOSITION
 Total LBM (kg) 0.04 0.46 −0.14 0.008 0.11 0.04 −0.06 0.26
 Appendicular lean mass (kg/m2) −0.01 0.83 −0.13 0.02 0.06 0.26 −0.11 0.04
 Total Fat mass (%) −0.17 0.001 −0.01 0.82 −0.13 0.015 0.16 0.02
MUSCLE FUNCTION
 Grip strength (kg) 0.17 0.75 −0.06 0.26 0.05 0.33 −0.05 0.38
 Relative grip strength (kg/BW) 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.39 −0.02 0.91
 Muscle Power (N; Takaï) 0.07 0.29 −0.03 0.61 0.09 0.16 −0.02 0.74
 Knee extension strength (kg) 0.004 0.95 −0.04 0.39 0.02 0.74 0.002 0.98
FUNCTIONAL CAPACITIES
 TUG (s) −0.019 0.72 0.03 0.52 −0.02 0.64 −0.02 0.66
 Fast TUG (s) −0.043 0.42 −0.01 0.79 −0.02 0.76 −0.09 0.11
 Sit-to-stand (s) −0.16 0.007 0.07 0.27 −0.16 0.008 −0.12 0.05
 Balance (s) 0.13 0.01 0.12 0.02 0.08 0.11 0.06 0.28
 Alternate step test (n) 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.68 0.09 0.08 0.011 0.84
AEROBIC CAPACITIES
 Estimated VO2 max (ml/min/kg) 0.11 0.04 0.05 0.41 0.07 0.21 0.12 0.03

Legend: Pearson correlations; Significant: P < 0.05. TUG timed up and Go, LBM lean body mass