TABLE 4.
The comparison of the open field test scores and sucrose preference of rats in different groups.
| Group | Open field test (scores) | Sucrose preference (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After CUMS and ISO-induced | After treatment | After CUMS and ISO-induced | After treatment | |
| Control | 160.17 ± 10.48 | 158.33 ± 12.4 | 91.69 ± 3.60 | 88.49 ± 2.91 |
| Model | 79.67 ± 6.80*** | 58.83 ± 3.06 | 58.89 ± 2.33*** | 55.03 ± 1.22 |
| Ser + Met | 82.83 ± 4.66***△ | 128.17 ± 8.4### | 57.68 ± 2.79***△ | 81.17 ± 1.93### |
| Ser | 77.5 ± 9.39***△ | 105.17 ± 7.9### | 59.30 ± 2.69***△ | 76.01 ± 3.68### |
| Met | 78.17 ± 6.94***△ | 96.67 ± 8.21### | 56.51 ± 1.54***△ | 62.04 ± 1.40### |
| XPF-H | 83.17 ± 2.63***△ | 148.50 ± 7.66### | 58.25 ± 4.25***△ | 87.07 ± 2.16### |
| XPF-M | 83.33 ± 0.13***△ | 122 ± 9.63### | 57.39 ± 3.36***△ | 82.13 ± 1.52### |
| XPF-L | 80.83 ± 7.98***△ | 109 ± 1### | 57.76 ± 2.28***△ | 76.78 ± 1.72### |
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD; n = 6–8 in each group. Compared with controll group after CUMS and ISO-induced.
***P < 0.005. Compared with model group after CUMS and ISO-induced, △ P > 0.05. Compared with model group after treatment, ### P < 0.005.