Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 4;62(2):118–124. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12679

Table 3.

The results of multilevel Poisson regressions examining the relationships of CCPT (Model 1) and MST performances (Model 2) with the number of commission errors in the GNG (both ns = 209)

Parameter Estimate SE Z p
Model 1
Intercept 1.96 0.05 43.25 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 600 ms ISI (1)] −0.54 0.05 −10.33 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 800 ms ISI (1)] −0.97 0.06 −16.09 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 1000 ms ISI (1)] −1.21 0.06 −19.09 <.001
CCPT 0.03 0.00 7.85 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 600 ms ISI (1)] × CCPT 0.02 0.00 4.81 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 800 ms ISI (1)] × CCPT 0.03 0.01 5.48 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 1000 ms ISI (1)] × CCPT 0.02 0.01 4.13 <.001
Model 2
Intercept 2.02 0.05 40.76 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 600 ms ISI (1)] −0.48 0.05 −9.91 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 800 ms ISI (1)] −0.85 0.06 −14.00 <.001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 1000 ms ISI (1)] −1.14 0.06 −17.65 <.001
MST 0.03 0.01 3.21 .001
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 600 ms ISI (1)] × MST 0.02 0.01 1.91 .056
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 800 ms ISI (1)] × MST 0.02 0.01 2.09 .037
Block [400 ms ISI (0) vs. 1000 ms ISI (1)] × MST 0.02 0.01 1.81 .070

GNG = Go/No‐Go Task; CCPT = Conners Continuous Performance Test 3rd Edition; MST = Modified Stroop Task; ISI = Inter‐stimulus interval.