Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;156(6):917–928. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15142

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of motor function between lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)‐ and endothelin‐1 (ET1)‐induced internal capsule (IC) injuries. Wire‐hanging test showing motor function in the PBS‐injected mice remained intact in all timepoints analyzed. In contrast, LPC‐injected mice displayed motor deficit at 7 and 14 dpl, and gradually recovered by 28 dpl. ET1‐injected mice displayed motor deficit in all post‐lesion timepoints but did not recover (PBS, n = 13 mice; LPC, n = 17 mice; ET1, n = 8 mice). Mean ± SD. Two‐way ANOVA, Tukey–Kramer test. *p < .05, **p < .01, n.s., not significant