Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;174(4):846–858. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24204

TABLE 4.

Comparison of important properties of photogrammetry, 3D surface scanning, CT scanning, and MicroScribe digitizer

Photogrammetry 3D surface scanning Clinical CT scanning MicroScribe digitizer
Type of information Surface (triangulated point cloud) Surface (triangulated point cloud) Volume (voxel) 3D coordinates of landmarks
Texture available Yes Yes (light‐scanners only) No No
Maximum resolution (in μm) 100 20 500 (ca. 5 for micro‐CT) 300
Total work time 1 h (+3 h of passive computer processing time) 5.5 h 1 h 30–45 min
Work time of subtasks

Photographs: 15 min

Passive computer processing time to calculate a surface mesh: 3 h

Post processing: 10 min

Landmark placement: 30 min

Scanning time: 2 h

Post processing: 3 h

Landmark placement: 30 min

Scanning time: 2 min

Post processing: 30 min

Landmark placement: 30 min

Landmark placement: 30–45 min. For approx. 100 landmarks
Transportation Portable Portable Samples need to be taken to the scanner Portable
Scaling of the model Not scaled Scaled Scaled Scaled
Challenges Reflective surfaces, small holes, sharp edges, translucent material Hair, reflective surfaces, small holes, sharp edges, translucent material, dark colors Metal, living individuals may be harmed, partial volume effect Landmark placement requires physical object, might harm the object, difficult to check and correct measurements