Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 17;42(2):188–205. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21909

TABLE 7.

Correlations between ARI‐CP 2–5 scales and ARI‐CP insecure attachment relationship indication and the AQS and EAS (N = 83)

AQS EAS child responsiveness EAS adult sensitivity
Secure .286 * (–.274 ** ) .236 * (–.163) .220 * (–.138)
Avoidant –.045 (–.173) –.001 (–.182 * ) –.028 (–.158)
Ambivalent –.176 (–.308 ** ) –.119 (–.302 ** ) –.066 (–.195 * )
Disorganized –.195 * (–.303 ** ) –.210 * (–.435 *** ) –.142 (–.376 *** )
Indication of perceived attachment relationship insecurity based on all scales (–.295 ** ) (–.362 *** ) (–.333 ** )

Note. The correlations in the brackets represent point biserial correlations, based on the cutoff scores of the ARI‐CP scales (0 = no indication of perceived attachment relationship insecurity, 1 = indication of perceived attachment relationship insecurity).

***< .001; ** < .01; * < .05.