Table 1. Related work summary comparison.
| Author | Year | Country | Dataset | Features | Method | Accuracy | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandrasekar et al. | 2015 | USA | General Crime in San Francisco | Date, Day of the week, Name of the Police Department District, Address, Latitude, Longitude, Category, Description, Resolution | RF, SVM, Gboost |
Md1 SVM 96% Md1 Gboosted 75.02% |
Including time series modeling to understand temporal correlations of blue/white collar and Violent/Nonviolent crime classification data and predicting fluctuations in different crime categories |
| Feng et al. | 2018 | USA | General Crime in San Francisco, Chicago, Philadelphia | Date, Category, Descript, Dayof Week, P. D. District, Resolution, Address, x, y, Dome, Arrest | NB, KNN, RF, XGBoost | XGboost 70% | Predicting overall crime in the coming years using time series |
| Kim et al. | 2018 | Canada | General Crime in Vancouver | Crime Type, Month, Day, Hour, Weekday, Address, Neighborhood, x, y |
KNN, XGBoost | Md1 Gboost 41.9% Md2 Gboost 43.2% |
Predicting crime location |
| Bharati et al. | 2018 | USA | General Crime in Chicago | Block, Location, District, Community Area, Latitude, X, Y, Longitude, Hour, Month, | KNN, LR, DT, RF, SVM, NB | KNN 78.9% | Detecting, predicting, and solving crimes much faster, thereby lowering the crime rate |
| Alves et al. | 2018 | Brazil | Murder Crimes | Child labor, Elderly -Female- Male Population, GDP, Homicides, Income, Literacy, Sanitation, Suicides, Traffic Accidents, Unemployment | RF | RF 97% | The prediction revealed that unemployment and ignorance were the most important variables in defining murders in Brazilian cities, and the order of importance of urban indicators in predicting crimes was determined. |
| Verma et al. | 2019 | India | Terrorist Incidents | Incident Location, Time, Type, Weapon, Intensity of Attack, Capital, Perpetrator | DT, RF, IG | RF 84% | Predicting the occurrence of terrorist incidents on demographic and geographic data |
| Jha et al. | 2019 | India | Murder Crimes on the Internet | Crime Type, Year, Address, Place, Territory | NB | NB 51.2% | Analyzing crimes in minimum time and predicting the location and type of future crimes |
| Arora et al. | 2019 | Public | Cybercrime Data Publicly Available on Social Media | Synonyms, Age, Location, Gender, Hashtags, and Sarcasm | RF | RF 80% | Detecting cyber threats automatically |
| Ghankutkar et al. | 2019 | Public | Real-time Crime Data from HuffPost News Site | Category, Headline, Authors, Link, Short Description, Date | SVM, MNB, RF | RF 85.83% | Providing analysis to current news after being classified as crime and non-crime data |
| Kumar et al. | 2020 | India | Murder, Kidnapping, Violence, Robbery, Gambling, Accident, Indore, Crimes | Hour, Longitude, Latitude, Day of the Week, Week, Month | KNN | Prev 93.23% Proposed 99.51% |
Predicting the type of crime, and where and when it may occur |
| Ch et al. | 2020 | India | Cybercrime | Incident, Harm, Access, Year, Violation, Victim, Offender | SVML, LR MNB, RF |
LR 99.3% | Finding and analyzing cyber-attacks that exploit vulnerabilities. |