Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;8:655727. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.655727

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis for incidence of breast cancer.

Analysis No. of studies included No. of patients/participants included RR (95% CI) p-value
SUBGROUP ANALYSIS
Different vitamin D dosage
Higha 3 251/13,403 1.02 (0.80, 1.31) 0.87
Low 4 94/5,734 1.09 (0.73, 1.63) 0.66
Different follow-up duration
Longb 3 261/14,217 1.02 (0.80, 1.30) 0.88
Short 4 84/4,920 1.11 (0.73, 1.69) 0.63
Study location
High latitudec 4 84/4,920 1.11 (0.73, 1.69) 0.63
Low latitude 2 15/1,132 1.09 (0.39, 3.11) 0.87
Menopausal status
Post- 5 95/5,811 1.07 (0.72, 1.60) 0.73
Pre-d - - - -
Unknown 2 250/13,326 1.03 (0.80, 1.32) 0.83
Baseline vitamin D level
Highe 4 263/14,420 1.02 (0.80, 1.30) 0.88
Low 3 82/4,717 1.11 (0.72, 1.70) 0.63
Sensitivity analysis
Excluding studies with high risk of bias 5 88/5,161 1.15 (0.76, 1.74) 0.52
Excluding studies that involved non-study cointerventions 4 8/680 1.00 (0.25, 3.97) 1.00
Using data of the lowest dose for each study 7 345/19,137 1.04 (0.84, 1.28) 0.71
Fixed-effects model 7 345/19,137 1.04 (0.84, 1.28) 0.71

RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

>1,500 IU/day.

b

>12 months.

c

>50°.

d

No study that included premenopausal women was found.

e

Serum 25(OH)D > 25 ng/ml.