Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 14;12(4):e00341. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000341

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the included studies

Author (yr) Location Per os PPI Mean age (yr) Male % of total Forrest classification Incidence of 30-d rebleeding (% of total) 30-d mortality (% of total)
IV PPI IA/IB IIA/IIB/IIC III
Bajaj et al. (25) (2007) Wisconsin, USA 12 63 14% 3 5 4 2/25 (8) 0 (0)
13 4 4 5
Chen et al. (26) (2015) Taiwan, Taipeia 156 No data No data 156b 0 18/323 (5.5) 3/323 (0.9)
167 167 0
Focareta et al. (27) (2004) Rotondo, Italy 45 No data No data 30 57c 0 No data No data
42 0
Jang et al. (28) (2006) Seoul, Korea 19 59.3 76.3% 6 13 0 3/38 (7.8) 1/38 (2.6)
19 4 15 0
Javid et al. (29) (2009) Kashmir, India 45 35.6 No data 19 26 0 No data No data
45 18 27 0
Kim et al. (30) (2012) Korea 54 No data 80.1% 21 33 0 4/106 (3.7) No data
52 18 34 0
Mostaghni et al. (31) (2011) Shiraz, Iran 44 59.4 74.1% 14 30 0 9/85 (10.5) 2/85 (2.3)
41 12 29 0
Sung et al. (32) (2014) Hong Kong, China 126 64 74% 55 71 0 17/244 (6.9) No data
118 51 67 0
Theyventhiran et al. (33) (2013) United States 52 No data No data 108c 0 0 No data 0/108
56 0 0
Tsai et al. (34) (2009) Taipei, Taiwan 78 68.7 72.4% 33 44 0 25/156 (16)d 3/156 (1.9)
78 31 47 0
Valizadeh Toosi et al. (35) (2018) Sari, Iran 90 No data 63% 90b 0 7/178 (3.9) 4/178 (2.2)
88 88 0
Yen et al. (36) (2012) Taipei, Taiwan 50 63.9 71% 22 28 0 No data 0/100 (0)
50 21 29 0
Yilmaz et al. (37) (2006) Diyarbakir, Turkey 99 52.7 68.7% 0 37 62 12/211 (5.6) 5/211 (2.4)
112 0 30 82
Karim et al. (9) (2020) Pakistan 104 56.3 60.5% 40 65 0 11/200 (5.5) 14/200 (7)
96 35 80 0

IV, intravenous; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

a

Chen et al. (2015) was a multicenter, while Kim et al. (2012) was a 2-center study; all the other randomized controlled trials included were single-center.

b

In the Chen et al. (2015) and Valizadeh et al. (2018) studies, there were no details with regards the specific Forrest classification of the bleeding ulcers, and only a wider interval was given.

c

In the Focareta et al. (2004) and Theyventhiran et al. (2013) studies, it was not specified nor the number of patients who received the IV treatment, neither the po treatment.

d

In Tsai et al. (2009) study, the explanation for the higher rebleeding rate is the use of epinephrine injection as single and primary method of hemostasis.