Table 2. Characteristics of included studies.
Author, year and location | Research design | N | Peer leader ages/ characteristics | Intervention type | Intervention characteristics | Frequency/duration of program | Leader selection process | School type | Training | Leaders: Outcome measures and findings | Recipients: Outcome measures and findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bausano (2006), USA (Dissertation) | Pre-post | 110 mentors | Ages 13–18 | Peer support | ’Natural Helpers’ program. Students identified as existing ’natural helpers’ within the school given training to enhance skills. | ~ 6 months. Unstructured meetings | Anonymous peer nominations | Secondary | Practice basic counselling skills, e.g., validation of emotions, problem-solving skills. Emphasis on positive coping strategies. Where/when/how to refer on. | Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale: no significant effect. | Not evaluated |
Ellis (2004), Australia (Dissertation) | Quasi-experimental | 99 mentors | Ages 15–17 | Peer support | Peer leaders co-facilitate sessions with a supervising teacher. Each group contains 8–10 year 7 students and 2 peer leaders. Aims to help develop positive attitude and resilience. | 12 x 45-minute weekly peer support sessions for 12 weeks | School-set criteria and answers to questions | Secondary | Intensive 2-day training. Emphasis on: creating a supportive atmosphere; active listening; leadership skills. Focusing on identifying needs and empathising with issues, instruction giving, planning a session. | SDQII-S and ROPE: non-significant improvement to self-confidence | Not evaluated |
Ellis et al. (2009), Australia | Quasi-experimental | 452 mentees | Mentees: ages 12–13; Mentors: ages 15–16 | Peer support | Peer leaders co-facilitate sessions with a supervising teacher. Each group contains 8–10 year 7 students and 2 peer leaders. Aims to help develop positive attitude and resilience. | 12 x 45-minute weekly peer support sessions for 12 weeks | School-set criteria and answers to questions | Secondary | Intensive 2-day training. Emphasis on: creating a supportive atmosphere; active listening; leadership skills. Focusing on identifying needs and empathising with issues, instruction giving, planning a session. | Not evaluated | SDQII-S and ROPE: no significant immediate effect on self-esteem. Significant f/u effect on self-confidence. |
Froh (2004), USA (Dissertation) | Quasi-experimental | 58 mentors | Ages 11–18 | Peer support | ’Natural Helpers’ program. Students identified as existing ’natural helpers’ within the school are given training to enhance helping skills. | Program running for > 4 years prior to study. Unstructured meetings | School-wide peer-nomination process | Secondary | 3-day retreat. Positive self-coping strategies. Effective interventions, e.g. facilitative listening. | Personal Development Inventory: non-significant increase in measure that includes self-confidence | Not evaluated |
Mason-Jones et al. (2013), South Africa | RCT | 203 peer educators | ~16 years old | Sexual health and wellbeing education | N/A–training program for peer educators only. | N/A | Volunteers. Additional selection criteria unclear | Secondary | 2 x 1-hour skills sessions per month for duration of intervention. Delivered by non-profit organisations. Talk groups and mentoring sessions. 3-day camps–information sessions. Focused on developing range of psychosocial skills in the peer leaders | Self Esteem Questionnaire: non-significant improvements to self-esteem | Not evaluated |
Roach (2014), England | Quasi-experimental | 372 mentees | Mentees: ages 9–12 Mentors: described as ‘older’ but specific ages not given | Mentoring & anti-bullying | Mentors aimed to establish supportive mentoring relationships. Drop-in service, one-to-one mentoring and group mentoring. | Ranged from 1–30 sessions | N/A | Primary and secondary | Training varied across schools | Not evaluated | Students Life Satisfaction Scale (modified): Mentees: higher levels of life satisfaction after 1 year. Girls scored lower than boys. Older mentees: more likely to have lower life satisfaction 1 year post intervention. Mentees who had fewer meetings recorded higher life satisfaction scores at 1-year follow-up. |
Sebire et al. (2018), UK | Cluster RCT | 249 supported peers | All participants female and aged 12–13 years old | Physical activity (PA) promotion | ‘PLAN-A’ intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention). | 10-week period of peer leaders asked to informally diffuse messages about importance of PA to friends and support to maintain/increase PA levels. | ‘Influential’ girls in year 8 nominated by same-year peers. Top 18% of nominations were invited to train as peer supporters. | Secondary | Initial 2-day course, followed by 1-day top-up around 5 weeks later. Training took place off-site at various locations, depending on school. Content involved education about importance of PA; empowerment; development of personal skills; different methods of support; core objectives of program. | Not evaluated | Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-Y): very small effect size in intervention group between T1 (post-study) and T2 (follow-up) (Cohen’s d = 0.088) |
Shah et al. (2001), Australia | Cluster RCT | Group 1: 66 mentees Group 2: 47 mentees*(total = 113) | Group 1: Mean age 15.5 Group 2: Mean age 12.5 | Physical health education | ’Triple A’ asthma management programme. Mentors used games, videos, worksheets and discussions to teach group 1. Group 1 gave interactive (short acts, drama and song) performances to group 2 on asthma management. | Mentors prepare 3x 45 minute lessons. Younger students prepare presentation | Students in older year group (age 16–17) volunteered as mentors for group 1; all group 1 students recruited to act as mentors to group 2 | Secondary | Workshop for older mentors (age 16–17 (‘asthma peer leaders’), how to use interactive delivery methods to teach peers | Not evaluated | Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: group 1 and 2 completed questionnaire. Non-significant improvement in overall quality of life in both groups. Males showed significant improvement (p = 0.02; 95% CI) in emotional domain. |
Song et al. (2018), China | Quasi-experimental | 118 mentors; 124 mentees | Ages 12–14 | Academic tutoring | Students divided by gender then split into highest and lowest performing halves of class. Required to study together for 30 minutes per day, four times per week. ~ 1 semester. | Range | Highest performing students in class | Secondary | ? | 100-item ‘Mental Health Questionnaire’: sig. increase in levels of guilt; sig. decreased social stress | 100-item ‘Mental Health Questionnaire’: sig. decrease in mental health scores; sig. increase in ‘learning stress’ |
Wyman et al. (2010), USA | RCT | 268 mentors | Mean age = 15.7 | Suicide prevention | ’Sources of Strength’ suicide prevention programme. Peers engaged in schoolwide messaging through presentations, public service announcements, videos, text messages and social network sites. Engaged trusted adults and encouraged friends to do same | Range as multiple tools employed | Peer and teacher nominations. Peers chosen to reflect diverse range of friendship groups | Secondary | Four hours. Led by certified trainers–focusing on coping skills and available resources. Interactive training. | Questions on recent suicidal ideation: decrease in suicidality over 3 months but not significant between conditions | Not evaluated |
Yogev and Ronen (1982), Israel | Quasi-experimental | 73 mentors | 16 years old | Academic tutoring | ’Young Tutors’ peer tutoring programme. Took place in schools and municipal youth clubs. Met 2 x per week during school hours. | ? | Offered as elective subject to freshman students (aged 16 years) | Secondary | 3 hours per week incorporated into class time. Lectures by school counsellors and invited specialists on adolescence and teaching methods. Included role-play, modelling and case analyses. | Self-Esteem Scale: significant increase in mentors’ self-esteem vs. comparison group | Not evaluated |
‘?’ represents not enough information provided in the text. Version of ‘peer leader’ kept as originally stated in study.
*This study used a cascading approach, whereby one year group delivered an intervention to a younger year group (group 1), who then passed aspects of that on to an even younger group (group 2).
**Also included small number of Children and Young People’s Community Organisations (CYPCOs).