Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;62(4):514–520. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.245464

TABLE 2.

Distribution of SSTR-RADS Score for 4 Identical TLs (n = 58) and for Overall SSTR-RADS Score (Scans, n = 51) Among All 4 Readers

Parameter Reader SSTR-RADS score
1* 2 3A 3B 3C 3D 4 5
4 identical TLs ER1 3/58 (5.2) 1/58 (1.7) 4/58 (6.9) 1/58 (1.7) 2/58 (3.4) 3/58 (5.2) 13/58 (22.4) 31/58 (53.5)
ER2 2/58 (3.4) 1/58 (1.7) 5/58 (8.6) 4/58 (6.9) 2/58 (3.4) 2/58 (3.4) 42/58 (72.4)
IR1 2/58 (3.4) 3/58 (5.2) 4/58 (6.9) 3/58 (5.2) 13/58 (22.4) 33/58 (56.9)
IR2 2/58 (3.4) 2/58 (3.4) 2/58 (3.4) 1/58 (1.7) 2/58 (3.4) 3/58 (5.2) 4/58 (6.9) 42/58 (72.4)
Overall SSTR-RADSscore ER1 3/51 (5.9) 4/51 (7.8) 1/51 (2) 3/51 (5.9) 2/51 (3.9) 1/51 (2) 37/51 (72.5)
ER2 3/51 (5.9) 2/51 (3.9) 7/51 (13.7) 1/51 (2) 1/51 (2) 2/51 (3.9) 35/51 (68.6)
IR1 7/51 (13.7) 1/51 (2) 1/51 (2) 2/51 (3.9) 11/51 (21.5) 29/51 (56.9)
IR2 5/51 (9.8) 3/51 (5.9) 1/51 (2) 2/51 (3.9) 2/51 (3.9) 38/51 (74.5)
*

SSTR-RADS-1A and -1B were subsumed under SSTR-RADS-1, as previously described (18).

ER = experienced reader; IR = inexperienced reader.

Values in parentheses are percentages.