Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;70(12):6032–6043. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004424

Table 4.

Average nucleotide identity (ANIb) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) comparisons of novel Helicobacter isolates with other closely related enterohepatic Helicobacter strains

Strains: 1, H. monodelphidis MIT 15-1451T; 2, H. didelphidarum MIT 17-337T; 3, H. aurati MIT 97-5075T;4, H. bilis ATCC 51630T; 5, H. canadensis MIT 98-5491T;6, H. ganmani MIT 99–5101; 7, H. mesocricetorum ATCC 700932T; 8, H. muridarum CCUG 29262T; 9, H. pullorum NCTC 12824T; 10, H. rodentium ATCC 700285T; 11, H. saguini MIT 97-6194-5T; 12, H. trogontum ATCC 700114T. All ANIb and dDDH comparisons were below the 95 and 70% thresholds, respectively, indicating H. monodelphidis MIT 15-1451T and H. didelphidarum MIT 17-337T are each novel species.

Genome ID

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

H. monodelphidis MIT 15–1451T

ANIb

100

78.69

71.11

71.17

71.43

70.96

71.31

70.95

71.1

71.59

70.57

71.39

dDDH

100

49.6

19.3

19.8

19

19.2

19.4

22.3

18.9

23.5

30

25.6

H. didelphidarum MIT 17–337T

ANIb

79.54

100

73.59

74.29

71.96

71.35

71.33

73.24

72.24

71.21

72.98

74.63

dDDH

49.6

100

21.7

21.1

25.2

19.3

29.2

20.1

37.5

23.7

23.7

23.6