Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 9;16(3):617–624. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02462-5

Table 4.

Association between Na variability (CV) and AKI development

No. of events (%) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) p value for trend OR (95% CI) p value for trend OR (95% CI) p value for trend

Q1

CV ≤ 0.71

209 (1.4) 1.00 (Reference) < 0.001 1.00 (Reference) < 0.001 1.00 (Reference) < 0.001

Q2

0.71 < CV ≤ 1.25

289 (2.1)

1.45 (121, 1.73)

p < 0.001

1.25 (1.04, 1.50)

p = 0.017

1.16 (0.97, 1.40)

p = 0.115

Q3

1.25 < CV ≤ 1.94

418 (2.9)

2.08 (1.77, 2.47)

p < 0.001

1.66 (1.40, 1.97)

p < 0.001

1.41 (1.18, 1.70)

p < 0.001

Q4

CV > 1.94

534 (3.8)

2.70 (2.30, 3.18)

p < 0.001

2.12 (1.79, 2.51)

p < 0.001

1.53 (1.24, 1.91)

p < 0.001

Model 1: Unadjusted model

Model 2: Multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, eGFR baseline

Model 3: Multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, Na value at hospital admission, eGFR baseline, Na lowest and highest peak value