Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;85(3):1201–1220. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01322-3

Table 4.

Correlations and 95% confidence intervals with performance accuracy and latent variable participant ability

Performance accuracy Participant ability
Age − 0.037 [− 0.162, .089]  < .001 [− 0.125, 0.126]
Gender − 0.042 [− 0.168, .084] − 0.057 [− 0.182, 0.069]
Active engagement 0.162 [0.037, 0.282] 0.146 [0.021, 0.267]
Emotions 0.296*** [0.177, 0.407] 0.301*** [0.182, 0.411]
Musical training 0.269*** [0.148, 0.382] 0.262*** [0.141, 0.375]
Perceptual abilities 0.333*** [0.216, 0.440] 0.328*** [0.211, 0.436]
Singing abilities 0.142 [0.016, 0.263] 0.125 [− 0.001, .247]
General sophistication 0.151 [0.026, 0.272] 0.124 [− 0.002, 0.246]

Significance is denoted as ***p < 0.001 [corrected for multiple comparisons using Holm’s (1979) procedure]