Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 25;43(1):65–83. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00215-y

Table 1.

Gastrocnemius fiber-type CSA in response to massage

WB WBM HS7 HSM WBM-L HSM-L
Type I 2133 ± 191 2296 ± 211 1786 ± 92 1820 ± 71 2251 ± 117 1777 ± 109
Type IIA 2095 ± 217 2143 ± 193 1584 ± 150 1766 ± 184 2052 ± 143 1729 ± 171
Type IIX 3386 ± 134 3379 ± 254 2480 ± 96 2582 ± 182 2840 ± 151* 2572 ± 204
Type IIB 4070 ± 291 4156 ± 234 3327 ± 189 3708 ± 177 3860 ± 119 2870 ± 147
Hybrid 2136 ± 172 1991 ± 113 1786 ± 111 1878 ± 93 1801 ± 103 1840 ± 181

Cross-sectional area (CSA, μm2) for individual fiber types for WB (n = 7), WB massaged limb WBM (n = 8), HS for 7 days HS7 (n = 8), HS massaged limb HSM (n = 9), WB non-massaged contralateral limb WBM-L (n = 8), and HS non-massaged contralateral limb HSM-L (n = 8). Two-tailed independent sample t tests between the respective control (WB or HS7) and either the massaged limb (WBM or HSM) or contralateral non-massaged limb (WBM-L or HSM-L) were used to determine statistical significance. Values are mean ± SEM. Significance is assumed at p < 0.05

*Significant difference from WB