Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 25;43(1):65–83. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00215-y

Table 4.

Gastrocnemius fiber-type distribution in response to massage during reloading (RE)

WB14 HS14 RE REM
Type I 10.8 ± 2.8 10.2 ± 1.6 10.3 ± 1.7 11.7 ± 2.0
Type IIA 13.2 ± 2.0 8.0 ± 1.5 11.1 ± 0.8 12.7 ± 1.4
Type IIB 44.3 ± 3.0 45.5 ± 4.7 48.3 ± 3.5 45.1 ± 2.4
Type IIX 29.9 ± 3.0 34.2 ± 2.8 26.8 ± 1.9 28.3 ± 1.6

Individual fiber-type distribution given as percentages (%) for weight bearing WB (n = 8), hindlimb suspension for 14 days HS14 (n = 8), reloading RE (n = 10), and RE massaged limb REM (n = 10). Values are mean ± SEM. A one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc analyses were used to determine statistical significance