Table 3.
Comparison of algorithms shortcomings with PC-SVM model
S. No | Algorithms | Shortcoming |
---|---|---|
1 | AdaBoost | This algorithm is affected by outliers and not effective in predicting the errors but SVM is free from outliers and effective in predicting the software defects [7] |
2 | CART | It has poor modeling with linear data while SVM can work with both linear as well as non-linear datasets [7] |
3 | KNN | It has a high rate of classification in comparison with SVM [7] |
4 | Neural Network | It works good with large datasets and taking time in training the datasets while our model has small datasets for that PC-SVM is better [7] |
5 | Chao Genetic | It has difficulty in providing the optimal solution while PC can provide [7] |
6 | EM model | It also does not guarantee in providing the optimal solution but our model PC-SVM can give [7] |