Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(4):1271–1283. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190019

Table 2.

The independent associations of bilingual status and sex with cognition in Hispanics/Latinos

Cognitive function
Learning Beta
[95% CI]
p
Memory Beta
[95% CI]
p
Fluency Beta
[95% CI]
p
DSS Beta
[95% CI]
p

Model 1
A Language Proficiency 0.52
[0.31–0.72]
p < 0.0001
0.17
[0.07–0.27]
p = 0.001
1.43
[1.16–1.69]
p < 0.0001
3.43
[2.98–3.89]
p < 0.0001
B Patterns of Use 0.21
[0.07–0.35]
p = 0.004
0.05
[−0.02–0.12]
p = 0.13
0.87
[0.68–1.06]
p < 0.0001
1.94
[1.58–2.30]
p < 0.0001
C Females versus Males 0.02
[0.02–0.02]
p < 0.0001
0.01
[0.01–0.01]
p < 0.0001
0.002
[−0.00–0.01]
p = 0.30
0.01
[0.00–0.02]
p = 0.008
Model 2
A Language Proficiency 0.29
[0.06–0.52]
p = 0.01
0.11
[0.01–0.22]
p = 0.03
0.67
[0.39–0.95]
p < 0.0001
2.03
[1.63–2.43]
p < 0.0001
B Patterns of Use 0.11
[−0.04–0.25]
p = 0.15
0.04
[−0.03–0.11]
p = 0.25
0.44
[0.25–0.63]
p < 0.0001
1.10
[0.77–1.43]
p < 0.0001
C Females versus Males 0.02
[0.02–0.03]
p < 0.0001
0.01
[0.01–0.01]
p < 0.0001
0.01
[0.00–0.01]
p = 0.04
0.02
[0.01–0.03]
p < 0.0001

DSS, Digit Symbol Substitution subtest; cognitive test score ranges were as follows: B-SEVLT Learning = 0–45, B-SEVLT Memory = 0–15, Fluency = 0–50, DSS = 0–80. Bolded entries denote significance at p < 0.05 with exact p-values outlined within the table. Model 1: Age-adjusted. Model 2: Adjusted for age as well as education, background, 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression score, annual family income, current occupation, years of US residency, and physical activity level; sex was also included as a covariable in Model 2A and Model 2B but as the predictor variable in Model 2C.