Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;10:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2021.100090

Table 4.

Comparison of Characteristics of HCC patients in DAAs and PR groups.

DAAs PR P value
N 29 25
Age (yr) 58.0 ± 8.3 60.8 ± 7.8 0.215
Male sex (n, %) 14 (48.3) 12 (48.0) 1.000
BMI (Kg/m2) 24.4 ± 3.1 23.4 ± 3.3 0.273
NAFLD (n, %) 18 (62.1) 7 (28.0) 0.026
Genotype (n, %) 0.310
1b 21 (72.4) 22 (88.0)
2a 7 (24.1) 3 (12.0)
Others 1 (3.4) 0 (0.0)
BCLC (n, %) 0.088
0 4 (13.8) 6 (24.0)
A 10 (34.5) 13 (52.0)
B 10 (34.5) 6 (24.0)
C 5 (17.2) 0 (0.0)
Numbers of nodule (n) 1.8 ± 1.2 1.6 ± 1.2 0.723
Cancer treatment (n, %) 0.021
Resection 8 (27.6) 2 (8.0)
Ablation 7 (24.1) 9 (36.0)
TACE 8 (27.6) 6 (24.0)
Liver transplantation 4 (13.8) 0 (0.0)
Systematic therapy 2 (6.9) 8 (32.0)
mRECIST (n, %) 0.200
CR 15 (51.7) 15 (60.0)
PR 5 (17.2) 1 (4.0)
SD 2 (6.9) 0 (0.0)
PD 7 (24.1) 9 (36.0)
Dead (n, %) 5 (17.2) 6 (24.0) 0.782
Follow-up time (months) 19.0 (13.0–23.5) 19.2 (14.9–24.5) 0.815

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± sd or median (IQR) and compared using the unpaired, 2-tailed t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentages) and compared using the chi-square test. CR, complete response; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease.