Table 2.
opinions of key informants about the EVD preparedness and readiness program respondents in the EVD preparedness and readiness evaluation, Uganda 2020
| Element | Agree | Disagree | Not sure | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| The entire program was a success | 25 | 92.6% | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | 3.7% | 27 |
| The coordination pillar is now more prepared to respond to EVD outbreaks | 23 | 88.5% | 1 | 3.8% | 0 | 0% | 26 |
| The surveillance and laboratory pillar is now more prepared to respond to EVD outbreaks | 26 | 96.3% | 1 | 3.7% | 0 | 0% | 27 |
| The case management and IPC pillar is now more prepared to respond to EVD outbreaks | 24 | 88.9% | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | 3.7% | 27 |
| The risk communication pillar is now more prepared to respond to EVD outbreaks | 24 | 96.0% | 1 | 4.5% | 0 | 0% | 25 |
| The psychosocial support pillar is now more prepared to respond to EVD outbreaks | 19 | 79.2% | 5 | 20.8% | 0 | 0% | 24 |
| The logistics pillar is now more prepared to respond to EVD outbreaks | 21 | 87.5% | 1 | 4.2% | 2 | 8.3% | 24 |
| The program had value for money | 25 | 92.6% | 1 | 3.7% | 1 | 3.7% | 27 |
| There were more cost-effective alternative interventions to deliver similar results | 9 | 34.6% | 6 | 23.1% | 11 | 42.3% | 26 |
| The investments were aligned to the national public health priorities | 22 | 84.6% | 1 | 3.8% | 2 | 7.7% | 26 |