Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul;34(7):1326–1333. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3352

Table 3:

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and misclassification error rate in the differentiation of tumor grades and genotypes

Sensitivity/Specificity, PPV/NPV cMRIa Multimodal MRIb,c
Gradeb
    II 73/65%, 67/72% 84/82%, 82/84%
    III 65/73%, 72/67% 82/84%, 84/82%
    Misclassification error rate 31% 17%
Genotypec
    1p/19q Loss 23/70%, 33/59% 29/79%, 46/64%
    1p/19q Intact 70/23%, 59/33% 79/29%, 64/46%
    Misclassification error rate 48% 40%

Note:—CE indicates contrast enhancement; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

The 6 most important predictors arising from the random forest analyses are:

a

CE+Location+Necrosis+Hemorrhage+Edema+Tumor borders

b

rCBF+rCBV+CE+ADC+Hemorrhage+ NAA/Cho at short TE

c

Location+ADC+rCBF+Cho/H2O+ NAA/Cr+lipids/H2O at short TE.