Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250250

Table 2. Sensitivity, accuracy and precision of UPT-LF, ELISA and HPLC-MS/MS methods for detection of multiple mycotoxins.

Mycotoxina Method LODb (μg/kg) Mean recovery (%) Minimum recovery (%) Maximum recovery (%) RSDc (%)
AFB1 UPT-LF 3 104.39±14.21 81.71 127.23 13.96
ELISA 2 101.75±8.99 87.94 124.64 8.89
HPLC-MS/MS 0.001 100.88±2.67 92.50 104.66 2.67
ZEN UPT-LF 50 102.94±15.40 76.47 129.24 13.71
ELISA 25 99.23±8.69 83.51 116.93 8.93
HPLC-MS/MS 0.01 101.46±2.72 96.59 105.02 1.89
DON UPT-LF 200 103.65±12.65 79.06 122.50 12.56
ELISA 250 100.43±7.82 89.00 115.55 8.02
HPLC-MS/MS 1 100.22±2.34 94.85 104.97 2.80

Means with different superscripts are significantly different within a column (P < 0.05). Data are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 15).

aAFB1, aflatoxin B1; ZEN, zearalenone; DON, deoxynivalenol.

bLOD, limit of detection.

cRSD, relative standard deviation.