Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250250

Table 7. Aflatoxin B1 contamination in feed mixtures measured by UPT-LF, ELISA and HPLC-MS/MS methods.

Feed mixture Method Positive rate (%) Mean value (μg/kg) Median value (μg/kg) Maximum value (μg/kg)
Pig concentrated feed UPT-LF 100 7.33±0.19 7.33 7.54
ELISA 100 9.43±2.87 11.05 11.95
HPLC-MS/MS 100 9.16±2.80 10.62 11.48
Laying hen concentrated feed UPT-LF 100 35.84±13.50 29.66 54.17
ELISA 100 24.27±9.43 22.73 35.73
HPLC-MS/MS 100 23.00±10.78 19.30 37.12
Broiler complete feed UPT-LF 100 19.65±6.38 22.01 24.87
ELISA 100 22.36±9.48 20.34 34.33
HPLC-MS/MS 100 17.68±8.02 15.52 30.61
Cow complete feed UPT-LF 100 36.51±10.16 33.69 51.88
ELISA 100 26.07±7.67 24.88 38.95
HPLC-MS/MS 100 26.61±8.00 23.03 39.51
Pig complete feed UPT-LF 100 7.26±1.77 6.95 10.27
ELISA 100 6.64±1.69 6.38 9.53
HPLC-MS/MS 100 5.86±1.52 5.71 8.22
Meat duck complete feed UPT-LF 60 10.59±12.26 22.43 25.09
ELISA 100 15.07±3.39 11.02 27.34
HPLC-MS/MS 100 14.92±7.88 11.19 28.56
Laying hen complete feed UPT-LF 100 30.22±3.72a 29.57 34.94
ELISA 100 17.79±4.18b 17.59 21.73
HPLC-MS/MS 100 17.85±4.02b 17.75 21.64

Means with different superscripts are significantly different within a column (P < 0.05). Data are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 5).