Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250250

Table 8. Zearalenone contamination in feed mixtures measured by UPT-LF, ELISA and HPLC-MS/MS methods.

Feed mixture Method Positive rate (%) Mean value (μg/kg) Median value (μg/kg) Maximum value (μg/kg)
Pig concentrated feed UPT-LF 100 73.63±9.98 68.83 88.97
ELISA 100 73.35±34.10 87.92 109.40
HPLC-MS/MS 100 84.96±21.97 79.49 110.98
Laying hen concentrated feed UPT-LF 100 325.65±61.38 333.27 418.52
ELISA 100 224.05±109.74 246.84 338.82
HPLC-MS/MS 100 238.05±122.33 253.80 394.23
Broiler complete feed UPT-LF 100 76.75±29.83 63.45 128.85
ELISA 100 92.96±27.15 91.60 135.33
HPLC-MS/MS 100 78.51±31.99 99.63 103.94
Cow complete feed UPT-LF 100 81.89±20.97 73.79 119.02
ELISA 100 88.05±34.49 98.62 126.23
HPLC-MS/MS 100 103.97±27.66 88.82 150.17
Pig complete feed UPT-LF 60 41.56±42.18ab 56.06 99.31
ELISA 100 71.12±16.77a 67.62 99.16
HPLC-MS/MS 100 29.04±3.35b 27.94 34.83
Meat duck complete feed UPT-LF 100 103.14±19.09a 93.94 127.65
ELISA 100 34.50±21.84b 23.50 69.57
HPLC-MS/MS 100 52.91±10.70b 57.40 61.03
Laying hen complete feed UPT-LF 100 70.95±18.90a 66.53 96.65
ELISA 100 34.92±9.17b 29.85 49.07
HPLC-MS/MS 100 43.33±3.25b 42.96 48.19

Means with different superscripts are significantly different within a column (P < 0.05). Data are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 5).