Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250250

Table 9. Deoxynivalenol contamination in feed mixtures measured by UPT-LF, ELISA and HPLC-MS/MS methods.

Feed mixture Method Positive rate (%) Mean value (μg/kg) Median value (μg/kg) Maximum value (μg/kg)
Pig concentrated feed UPT-LF 80 482.50±246.52 520.00 680.00
ELISA 100 384.14±241.40 374.20 680.35
HPLC-MS/MS 100 517.90±254.20 581.23 681.23
Laying hen concentrated feed UPT-LF 100 424.00±174.73 450.00 680.00
ELISA 100 398.01±130.45 453.28 512.69
HPLC-MS/MS 100 445.24±192.66 462.53 642.30
Broiler complete feed UPT-LF 100 302.00±132.93 210.00 480.00
ELISA 100 221.95±134.60 150.12 421.37
HPLC-MS/MS 100 345.27±125.51 271.03 521.94
Cow complete feed UPT-LF 100 858.00±427.22 970.00 1230.00
ELISA 100 825.11±461.80 990.34 1231.72
HPLC-MS/MS 100 806.09±446.44 980.34 1233.67
Pig complete feed UPT-LF 100 276.00±67.31a 260.00 380.00
ELISA 100 209.14±41.89b 180.34 256.31
HPLC-MS/MS 100 304.86±50.30a 331.28 356.91
Meat duck complete feed UPT-LF 100 204.00±145.02 200.00 410.00
ELISA 100 210.82±136.39 174.20 450.36
HPLC-MS/MS 100 202.24±115.80 145.31 403.69
Laying hen complete feed UPT-LF
ELISA
HPLC-MS/MS 100 17.81±4.42 16.34 24.91

Means with different superscripts are significantly different within a column (P < 0.05). Data are expressed as Mean ± SD (n = 5).