Table 3. Distribution of survey responses according to satisfaction with different webinars and online meetings (n = 326).
| Strongly dissatisfied | Dissatisfied | Satisfied | Strongly satisfied | Χ2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic, what is your general impression on shifting scientific meetings to webinars and online meetings? | 4 (1.2%) | 29 (8.9%) | 183 (56.1%) | 61 (18.7%) | 272.704* | <0.001* |
| What is your impression on shifting international conferences and teaching courses to webinars and online meetings? | 2 (0.6%) | 39 (12%) | 158 (48.5%) | 85 (26.1%) | 190.845* | <0.001* |
| What is your impression on shifting pharmaceutically-sponsored meetings to webinars and online meetings? | 4 (1.2%) | 97 (29.8%) | 69 (21.2%) | 66 (20.2%) | 78.271* | <0.001* |
| In general, what is your impression on the scientific content of the International conferences as webinars and online meetings? | 1 (0.3%) | 14 (4.3%) | 200 (61.3%) | 67 (20.6%) | 391.703* | <0.001* |
| In general, what is your impression on the scientific content of the pharmaceutically-sponsored meetings as webinars and online meetings? | 7 (2.1%) | 113 (34.7%) | 91 (27.9%) | 29 (8.9%) | 125.667* | <0.001* |
χ2: Chi square for Goodness of fit.
*: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.