Abstract
Background:
Estrogen increases dramatically during pregnancy, but quickly drops below prepregnancy levels at birth and remains suppressed during the postpartum period. Clinical and rodent work suggests that this postpartum drop in estrogen results in an “estrogen withdrawal” state that is related to changes in affect, mood, and behavior. How estrogen withdrawal impacts oxytocin neurocircuitry has not been examined.
Methods:
We used a hormone-simulated pseudopregnancy followed by estrogen withdrawal in Syrian hamsters, a first for this species. Ovariectomized females were given daily injections to approximate hormone levels during gestation and then withdrawn from estrogen to simulate postpartum estrogen withdrawal. Subjects were tested for behavioral assays of anxiety and anhedonia during estrogen withdrawal. Following sacrifice, neuroplasticity in oxytocin-producing neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH) and its efferent targets was measured.
Results:
Estrogen-withdrawn females had increased anxiety-like behaviors in the elevated plus and open field, but did not differ from controls in sucrose preference. Furthermore, estrogen-withdrawn females had more oxytocin-immunoreactive cells and oxytocin mRNA in the PVH, as well as an increase in oxytocin receptor density in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). Finally, blocking oxytocin receptors in the DRN during estrogen withdrawal prevented the high-anxiety behavioral phenotype in estrogen-withdrawn females.
Conclusions:
Estrogen withdrawal induces oxytocin neuroplasticity in the PVH and DRN to increase anxiety-like behavior during the postpartum period. More broadly, these experiments suggest Syrian hamsters as a novel organism in which to model the effects of postpartum estrogen withdrawal on the brain and anxiety-like behavior.
Keywords: postpartum depression, pregnancy, anxiety, serotonin, paraventricular nucleus
Introduction
During pregnancy and the postpartum period, many hormones fluctuate and likely contribute uniquely to peripartum changes in physiology, behavior, and mood/affect. Among these hormones, peripartum fluctuations in estrogen levels are particularly dramatic: estrogen, synthesized primarily in the placenta, rises 100-1000-fold during the third trimester (1). Following birth and the expulsion of the placenta, however, estrogen levels quickly drop to below pre-partum levels and remain suppressed until ovulation resumes weeks to months later (2). It has been hypothesized that the rapid and dramatic drop in estrogen during the postpartum period results in an “estrogen withdrawal state” that contributes to the etiology of postpartum psychological disorders (3). In support of this idea, several studies have found that symptoms of postpartum depression can be attenuated by estradiol treatment in women (4-6).
How estrogen withdrawal contributes to the etiology of peripartum psychological disorders is unclear. To better understand the impact of this dramatic endocrine change, some researchers have turned to rodent models. In particular, several groups have employed a hormone-simulated pseudopregnancy (HSP) model to directly test the impact of estrogen withdrawal on the brain and behavior. Initially developed in female Long-Evans rats (7), this model has successfully been replicated (8) and extended to Sprague-Dawley rats (9-13), and ICR mice (14,15). Consistent with the clinical literature, estrogen withdrawal following HSP results in a behavioral phenotype that may reflect depressed mood (7-12) and/or heightened anxiety (11,14,15) in rodents. In many cases, these behavioral changes can be prevented by continued administration of estradiol during the postpartum period, also matching the data from human studies.
An extreme, systemic endocrine shift like postpartum estrogen withdrawal is likely to impact multiple, distributed brain regions that have distinct effects on behavior. Despite this, the majority of studies that have used HSP to examine how postpartum estrogen withdrawal impacts the brain have focused on the hippocampus (8,11,13,14). Only one study to date has examined the impact of estrogen withdrawal outside of the hippocampus (15) and none have examined the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH). The PVH is a highly-conserved hypothalamic subnucleus that secretes neuropeptides either into peripheral circulation via the neurohypophysial system, or to neural targets via centrally-projecting neurons (16). In particular, oxytocin (OT), synthesized primarily in the PVH and supraoptic nucleus (SON), is considered a key modulator of physiology, behavior, and affective processes associated with pregnancy and the postpartum period (17). Oxytocin receptors (OTR) are located in several estrogen-sensitive brain nuclei and are functionally implicated in maternal behaviors, anxiety, depression, social cognition, and sexual behavior (18,19). Furthermore, estrogen increases both the secretion of OT and the expression of OTRs in the brain (20), suggesting the oxytocinergic system as a likely target for neuroplasticity underlying behavioral changes during postpartum estrogen withdrawal.
Using Syrian hamsters, a well-established rodent model of reproductive and affective behaviors, we investigated the role of estrogen withdrawal following HSP on behavioral assays of mood and affect, as well as oxytocin neuroplasticity in the PVH and its estrogen-sensitive efferent targets. Initial experiments demonstrated that estrogen withdrawal increased oxytocin receptor binding uniquely in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), an estrogen-sensitive efferent of the PVH that is known to regulate anxiety behavior. Subsequent experiments therefore focused on determining the role of oxytocin in the DRN in regulating anxiety behavior following estrogen withdrawal.
Methods and Materials
Subjects
For all experiments, adult female Syrian hamsters were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, Massachusetts) at approximately 55 days of age. The experimental groups and numbers of subjects for each experiment can be found in Table 1 and additional information can be found in the Supplementary Methods.
Table 1.
Experimental groups, numbers of animals, and dependent variables for each experiment.
Experiment | Groups (n) | Dependent Variables |
---|---|---|
1A: Effect of Estrogen Withdrawal on Anxiety-Like Behaviors | Withdrawn (n = 8) Sustained (n = 8) No Hormone (n = 8) |
Elevated Plus Open Field Locomotor behavior |
1B: Effect of Estrogen-Withdrawal on Anhedonia | Withdrawn (n = 8) Sustained (n = 8) |
Sucrose Preference Sucrose Consumed |
2A: Effect of Estrogen-Withdrawal on Oxytocin-Producing Cells | Withdrawn (n = 8) Sustained (n = 8) No Hormone (n = 8) |
Number of OT-ir cells in PVH and SON and NeuN-ir cells in PVH |
2B: Effect of Estrogen-Withdrawal on OT Gene Expression in PVH | Withdrawn (n = 6) Sustained (n = 6) |
OT mRNA (qPCR) in PVH |
3: Effect of Estrogen-Withdrawal on OTR density in PVH efferent targets | Withdrawn (n = 8) Sustained (n = 8) No Hormone (n = 8) |
OTR density in MeA, BNST, NAc Core, NAc Shell, and Dorsal Raphe |
4: Effect of Blocking OTRs in DRN during Estrogen-Withdrawal on Anxiety-Like Behaviors | Withdrawn VEH (n = 8) Sustained VEH (n = 8) Withdrawn OTA (n = 9) Sustained OTA (n = 7) |
Elevated Plus Open Field |
Estrogen Withdrawal Following Hormone-Simulated Pseudopregnancy (HSP)
Following recovery from ovariectomy (see Surgery), the HSP protocol (7) was initiated. In this model, ovariectomized females are given daily injections of estrogen and/or progesterone in doses that are known to reliably induce maternal behaviors in nulliparous ovariectomized rats (21-23). For these experiments, we have modified the protocol to fit the shorter gestational timeline (17d) of Syrian hamsters (24). All hamsters were administered daily subcutaneous injections of hormone dissolved in cottonseed oil vehicle (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) over a 22-day period (see Supplementary Methods). In some experiments, both withdrawn and sustained females were compared to a “no hormone” condition, in which females received daily vehicle (oil) injections for all 22 days of the HSP.
Behavior Testing
Elevated Plus.
An elevated plus test was used to assess anxiety-like behavior (see Supplementary Methods) on days 20 or 21. This test was chosen because it has previously been used to measure anxiety-like behavior following HSP in rats and mice (11,14,15) and has been validated as a model for anxiety behavior testing in Syrian hamsters (25).
Open Field.
An open field test was used to measure anxiety-like behavior and spontaneous locomotor activity on days 20 or 21. This test was chosen because it has been used previously following HSP in rats and mice (11,14,15).
Sucrose Preference Test.
In a separate cohort of hamsters, a sucrose preference test was used to assess anhedonia, a core feature of depressed mood, on days 20 and 21 (see Supplementary Methods). This test was chosen because sucrose consumption and preference has previously been shown to decrease following HSP in rats (8).
Surgery
All surgery was conducted using aseptic surgical technique and under isoflurane anesthesia (2-3% vaporized in oxygen, Piramal, Bethlehem, PA, USA). Analgesic (Meloxicam, 2mg/kg, Portland, ME, USA) was administered subcutaneously immediately prior to the start of surgery and for three days postoperatively. For detailed descriptions of surgical procedures see Supplemental Methods.
Ovariectomy.
In order to remove the endogenous source of circulating estrogen and progesterone, females were bilaterally ovariectomized prior to the initiation of the hormone simulated pregnancy.
Dorsal Raphe Cannulation.
At least 1 week following ovariectomy, subjects in Experiment 4 were implanted with 26-guage stainless steel guide cannulae (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) targeting the dorsal raphe nucleus.
Drug Injections
Subjects were injected with either oxytocin receptor antagonist (OTA, [d(CH2)51, Tyr(Me)2, Thr4, Orn8, des-Gly-NH29]OVT), a highly selective antagonist at OTRs (26), or sterile saline 10 min prior to testing in the elevated plus or open field. See Supplementary Methods for details.
Histology and Tissue Processing
Perfusion and Immunohistochemistry.
For experiments requiring immunolocalization of oxytocin or Neuronal Nuclei (NeuN) protein, subjects were sacrificed by intracardial perfusion. See Supplementary Methods for details.
Receptor Autoradiography.
For experiments measuring changes in oxytocin receptor density following a hormone simulated pregnancy, receptor autoradiography (see Supplementary Methods) was performed on eight regions of interest: the cingulate cortex (Cg1), prelimbic cortex (PrL), infralimbic cortex (IL), nucleus accumbens core (NAcC), nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), medial amygdala (MeA), and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN).
Cannulae Placement Verification.
At the conclusion of the DRN cannulation experiment, subjects were given an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (Beuthanasia-D Special), and an automated syringe pump was used to infuse 250 nL of India Ink (Dr. Ph. Martin’s, Salis International, Oceanside, CA, USA) to mark the location of the injection site. Subjects brains were removed and post-fixed in paraformaldehyde for 48 h. A cryostat (Leica CM1850, Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) was used to collect 40-μm sections through the DRN. Sections were mounted onto slides and a brightfield microscope (Nikon) using SpotBasic software (Diagnostic Instruments) was used to acquire an image of the location of the ink injection.
qPCR.
On Day 22, subjects were euthanized via anesthetized rapid decapitation, brains were extracted, and tissue sections (1-mm thick) containing the PVH were taken using a cooled brain matrix. Bilateral tissue punches (1-mm diameter) of the PVH were rapidly collected from cooled tissue sections and stored in RNA-later (Quiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) for qPCR analysis (see Supplementary Methods).
Statistical Analysis
All statistics were run on Prism Software (Graphpad, San Diego, CA, USA). In Experiment 1, difference scores were calculated for the elevated plus (time spent in closed arms - time spent in open arms) and open field (time spent in periphery - time spent in center) and one-way ANOVAs were used to determine whether difference scores varied by experimental condition. Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were used to examine significant omnibus tests for group differences. In Experiment 2, one-way ANOVAs or unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used to determine whether cell counts (OT or NeuN) varied by experimental conditions. Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were used to examine significant omnibus tests for group differences. Likewise, unpaired two-tailed t tests were used to determine whether OT gene expression differed between experimental condition. In Experiment 3, one-way ANOVAs were used to determine whether optical densities (dpm/mg) varied by experimental conditions. Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were used to examine significant omnibus tests for group differences. In Experiment 4, difference scores were calculated for the elevated plus and open field and two-way ANOVAS were used to probe for interactions and main effects of hormone condition (sustained vs. withdrawn) and drug condition (OTA vs. vehicle). t tests with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons were used to explicate interactions.
Results
Experiment 1: Effect of estrogen withdrawal on behavioral measures of anxiety and depression
Elevated Plus.
There was a significant effect of hormone condition on the amount of time spent in the closed arms minus the amount of time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus (F(2,21) = 14.72, p = .0001). Post hoc tests revealed that sustained females did not differ from no hormone females with regard to where they spent their time in the elevated plus (p = 0.1184); animals in both of these groups spent roughly equivalent amounts of time in both arms. However, withdrawn females differed from both no hormone females (p = 0.0091) and sustained females (p < 0.0001); animals in the withdrawn group spent more time on average in the closed arms than the open arms, indicating a higher anxiety phenotype (Figure 1A).
Figure 1: Effect of Estrogen Withdrawal on Anxiety-Like Behaviors.
A) Withdrawn females showed a high-anxiety behavioral phenotype in the elevated plus compared to sustained females or no hormone controls. B) Withdrawn females showed a high-anxiety behavioral phenotype in the open field compared to sustained females, but did not differ from no hormone controls. These differences in anxiety-like behavior are not mediated by a more general locomotor deficit, as there is no effect of hormone condition on distance traveled (C and E) or average velocity (D and F) in either test. Data presented as mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05.
Open Field.
There was a significant effect of hormone condition on the amount of time spent in the periphery minus the amount of time spent in the center of the open field (F(2,21) = 5.457, p = 0.0123). Post hoc tests revealed that no hormone females did not differ from sustained females with regard to where they spent their time in the open field (p = 0.4781). Likewise, no hormone females did not differ from withdrawn females with regard to where they spent their time in the open field (p = 0.1176). However, sustained females differed from withdrawn females (p = 0.0100); animals in the withdrawn groups spent more time on average in the periphery than in the center, indicating a higher anxiety phenotype (Figure 1B).
Locomotor Behavior.
There was no effect of hormone condition on distance traveled or average velocity in either the elevated plus or open field (see Supplementary Results).
Sucrose Preference.
There was no effect of hormone condition on sucrose preference (see Supplementary Results and Supplementary Figure 1).
Experiment 2: Effects of estrogen withdrawal on oxytocin neurons in the PVH
The number of OT-immunoreactive (−ir) neurons in the PVH (Figure 2A) and supraoptic nucleus (SON, Figure 2B) was counted and compared between groups. There was a significant effect of hormone condition on the number of OT-ir cells in the PVH (F(2,21) = 22.67, p < 0.0001). Post hoc tests revealed that while the no hormone and sustained groups did not differ from each other (p = 0.7191), the withdrawn group had significantly more OT-ir cells than both the no hormone group (p < 0.0001) and the sustained group (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2C). There was no effect of hormone condition on the number of OT-ir cells in the SON, F(2,21) = 0.6547, p = 0.5299) (Figure 2D).
Figure 2: Effect of Estrogen-Withdrawal on Oxytocin-Producing Cells.
A) Representative OT-ir staining and counting domains in the PVH. B) Representative OT-ir staining and counting domains in the SON. C) In the PVH, the total number of OT-ir cells was significantly higher in withdrawn females than in sustained or no hormone controls. D) In the SON, the total number of OT-ir cells did not differ between hormone conditions. E) The total number of NeuN-ir cells in the PVH did not differ across hormone conditions. F) There was an approximately three-fold increase in OT gene expression in withdrawn females compared to estrogen sustained females. Scale bars = 200 μm, data presented as mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05.
There was no effect of hormone condition on the total number of NeuN-ir neurons in the PVH (F(2,21) = 0.2457, p = 0.7843), suggesting that the increase in OT-ir neurons is unlikely to be the result of neurogenesis (Figure 2E).
qPCR was used to assess OT mRNA in the PVH of a separate cohort of sustained and withdrawn females. There was a significant increase in OT mRNA in withdrawn animals compared to sustained animals (t(10) = 7.318, p < 0.001), suggesting that the increase in OT-ir cells is unlikely to reflect a decrease in OT release (Figure 2F).
Experiment 3: Effects of estrogen withdrawal on oxytocin receptors in PVH efferent targets
There was no effect of hormone condition on OTR density in Cg1, PrL, IL, NAcC, NAcSh, or MeA (Figure 3A-G, and supplementary results). However, there was a significant effect of hormone condition on OTR density in the DRN (F(2,21) = 13.43, p = 0.0002). While the no hormone group did not differ from the sustained group (p = 0.4521), OTR density was significantly higher in the withdrawn group than the no hormone group (p = 0.0002) and the sustained group (p = 0.0033, Figure 3H).
Figure 3: Effect of Estrogen-Withdrawal on OTR density in estrogen-sensitive PVH efferents.
OTR autoradiographic binding did not differ across hormone conditions in A) the cingulate cortex (Cg1), B) the prelimbic cortex (PrL), C), the infralimbic cortex (IL), D) the NAc Core, E) the NAc shell, F) the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), or G) or the medial amygdala (MeA). H) In the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), however, withdrawn females had significantly higher OTR autoradiographic binding than sustained or no hormone controls. Representative autoradiographs with analysis boxes over the region of interest are shown next to each data set. Data presented as mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05.
Experiment 4: Effects of blocking oxytocin receptors in the DRN on anxiety-like behaviors
Cannulae Placement.
One hamster did not recover from cannulation surgery and the cannulae on eight hamsters did not remain intact and/or patent throughout the HSP protocol. In the remaining 51 hamsters, histological verification of cannulae placement using post-mortem ink injections showed that drug injections targeted the transition between the rostral and caudal DRN (5.4 - 5.7 mm posterior to Bregma, Figure 4A, (27)) in 32 subjects. Further, the angled cannulation approach resulted in bias for injections to target the lateral portion of the DRN. Subjects with cannulae outside of the DRN were misplaced either in the lateral periaqueductal gray (LPAG; n = 5), the fourth ventricle (n = 6), the lateral dorsal tegmental nucleus (n = 5) or, more rarely, the medial longitudinal fasciculus (n = 3); these animals were considered misses and removed from the analyses.
Figure 4: Effect of Blocking OTRs in DRN during Estrogen-Withdrawal on Anxiety-Like Behaviors.
A) Post-mortem localization of ink injections was used to determine whether placements accurately targeted the DRN (“hit,” filled circles) or were misplaced (“miss,” open circles) and therefore eliminated from analyses. OTA injection into the DRN reverses the high-anxiety behavioral phenotype seen in withdrawn females in B) the elevated plus and C) the open field. Although there was a main effect of hormone condition on distance traveled in the elevated plus, differences in anxiety-like behavior are unlikely to be mediated by a more general locomotor deficit, as there was no difference in distance traveled (D and E) or average velocity (F and G) between sustained and withdrawn females who received vehicle (VEH) injections or OTA injections. Scale bar = 100 μm, data presented as mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05.
Elevated Plus.
There was a significant interaction between hormone condition (sustained vs. withdrawn) and drug condition (OTA vs. vehicle) (F(1,28) = 8.916, p = 0.0058) in the elevated plus (Figure 4B). Post hoc tests revealed that in females who received vehicle injections into the DRN, the sustained and withdrawn groups differed from each other (t(28) = 3.532, p = 0.0029): sustained animals who received vehicle spent more time in the open arms of the elevated plus, whereas withdrawn animals who received vehicle spent more time in the closed arms of the elevated plus. In females who received OTA injections into the DRN, the sustained and withdrawn groups did not differ from each other (t(28) = 0.7018, p = 0.9772); both groups spent more time in the open arms of the elevated plus.
Open Field.
There was a significant interaction between hormone condition and drug condition (F(1,28) = 44.73, p < 0.0001) in the open field (Figure 4C). Post hoc tests revealed that in females who received vehicle injection into the DRN, the sustained and withdrawn groups differed from each other (t(28) = 6.701, p < 0.0001): sustained animals who received vehicle spent more time in the center of the open field, whereas withdrawn animals who received vehicle spent more time in the periphery of the open field. In females who received OTA injections into the DRN, the sustained and withdrawn groups also differed from each other (t(28) = 2.773, p = 0.0195): although both sustained and withdrawn females spent more time in the center of the open field, withdrawn females who received OTA spent more time in the center than did sustained females who received OTA.
Locomotor Behavior.
There was no significant interaction between hormone and drug condition on distance traveled in the elevated plus (F(1,23) = 0.01153, p = 0.9154, Figure 4D) or the open field (F(1,23) = 2.208, p = 0.1509, Figure 4E). Interestingly, there was a main effect of hormone condition on distance traveled in the elevated plus (F(1,23) = 8.002, p = 0.0095), but post hoc tests did not detect significant differences between sustained and withdrawn females who received vehicle injections (t(23)=1.887, p = 0.1437) or OTA injections (t(23)=2.119, p = 0.0902). There was no significant interaction between hormone and drug condition on average velocity in the elevated plus (F(1,23) = 0.008757, p = 0.9263, Figure 4F) or the open field (F(1,20) = 0.01354, p = 0.9085, Figure 4G).
Discussion
Here we demonstrate for the first time that estrogen withdrawal following HSP increases behavioral measures of anxiety in Syrian hamsters. Further, these increases in anxiety-like behavior are concurrent with increases in OT production in the PVH and increased OTR density in the DRN. Finally, blocking OTRs in the DRN during estrogen withdrawal prevents the increase in anxiety-like behavior in withdrawn females, but has minimal effect in females who continued to receive estrogen throughout the simulated postpartum period. Together, these results suggest a model in which postpartum estrogen withdrawal increases oxytocin transmission in the PVH and DRN, either independently or as part of a neural pathway, to increase anxiety-like behavior during the postpartum period.
These data add to a growing body of literature that uses HSP to model the impact of postpartum estrogen withdrawal, and expands the model to Syrian hamsters and to oxytocinergic neural circuitry. Although the HSP model does not provide a complete simulation of the hormonal changes that occur during the peripartum period, it allows researchers to isolate and manipulate postpartum estrogen withdrawal as a single independent variable, permitting causal inferences about resulting changes in the brain and behavior. Further, unlike in women, most common laboratory rodents experience postpartum and lactational estrus (28), during which estrogen levels rise sharply; in this way, estrogen withdrawal following HSP better models the human experience of postpartum estrogen withdrawal than would naturally-parturient rodents. It is noteworthy that the observed effects on behavior and neuroplasticity in this study required HSP treatment followed by estrogen withdrawal; this suggests that both the rise in estrogen, as would occur during pregnancy, and the subsequent withdrawal from estrogen, as would occur during the early postpartum period, are required. Future studies will need to address whether these effects are temporary or persist past the early postpartum period.
Differences in model organisms may influence behavioral outcomes of estrogen withdrawal. Similar to in the current study, estrogen withdrawal following HSP in Sprague-Dawley rats (11) and ICR mice (14,15) increases behavioral indicators of anxiety, suggesting that elevated anxiety following postpartum estrogen withdrawal is a robust behavioral phenomenon and may reflect an adaptive response that serves to increase vigilance during a vulnerable time. Although the elevated plus and open field are validated measures of anxiety-like behaviors in Syrian hamsters (25), our data demonstrate that control females do not always show a preference for the periphery of the open field or the closed arms of the elevated plus. It is perhaps even more notable then that estrogen withdrawal results in a very robust anxiety-like response in both behavioral assays, and that this behavioral response can be prevented by blocking oxytocin receptors in the DRN. In contrast, the current study did not find an effect of estrogen withdrawal on sucrose preference, despite this being reported in rats (8,12). This may reflect differences in the methods (e.g., 2% vs. 3% sucrose solution), or differences in the behavioral ecology of the two species. Although hamsters are capable of forming sucrose preferences (29), they consume less water per body weight than rats (30). As such, a drinking-based assay may not be the most robust test of anhedonia in this species. Future studies may wish to use other assays, such as intracranial self-stimulation (9), to test the effect of estrogen withdrawal on anhedonia in hamsters.
Although the HSP model has low ecological validity, the current findings are corroborated by data from postpartum rats (31,32), rabbits (33), and sheep (34), in which OT-immunoreactivity is increased in the PVH. Caldwell et al. also found increased OT-immunoreactivity in the SON of postpartum female rats, which differs from our findings using the HSP model; this suggests that while OT levels in the PVH and SON are both dynamic during the peripartum period, only PVH OT levels are likely to be mediated by estrogen withdrawal. Our finding that OTR autoradiographic binding is increased in the DRN of estrogen withdrawn females is also supported by recent data from naturally-parturient females showing that OTR autoradiographic binding and OT-ir fibers are increased in the DRN of postpartum rats (35). What’s more, viral-mediated knockdown of OTR mRNA in the DRN of postpartum rats decreases anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus (35), mirroring our finding that pharmacological blockade of OTRs in the DRN decreased anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus during estrogen withdrawal. When coupled with previous data, this suggests that 1) oxytocin in the DRN has anxiogenic effects on behavior and 2) these effects may depend on postpartum estrogen withdrawal. Our experiments did not address the effect of blocking OTRs in the DRN of no-hormone or cycling females; it is possible that oxytocin binding in the DRN may have effects outside of postpartum estrogen withdrawal, and/or that estrogen withdrawal potentiates a broader effect of OTA. Likewise, we focused our investigation of oxytocin receptor plasticity on PVH efferent targets that are known to regulate affective behavior and are sensitive to estrogen; it is likely, however, that other brain regions show changes in oxytocin receptor density in response to estrogen withdrawal and have differing effects on behaviors. Ultimately, these data join a growing body of literature challenging the dogma that OT is primarily anxiolytic (18,36) and suggests the need for more site-specific investigations of OT’s role in modulating affective behaviors.
The mechanism by which estrogen withdrawal increases OT-ir cells in the PVH is not known. The current experiments suggest that it is not an artifact of decreased OT release, as OT mRNA levels also increase substantially in withdrawn females, which would not be expected with decreased release. Further, it is unlikely to reflect an increase in the total number of cells, as we did not observe an increase in NeuN-immunoreactivity between hormone conditions. One intriguing possibility is that postpartum estrogen withdrawal is causing PVH cells to switch their neurochemical phenotype, either temporarily or permanently. This is not without precedent in the hypothalamus: in pregnant and lactating mice, tuberoinfundibular neurons in the arcuate nucleus begin synthesizing and releasing met-enkephalin rather than dopamine (37). The mechanism of this phenotypic switch depends on elevated prolactin levels during pregnancy suppressing dopamine synthesis in an opiate-dependent manner. It is possible that the massive fluctuations in estrogen during pregnancy and the postpartum period may similarly result in neurochemical plasticity at the level of individual neurons in order to facilitate behavioral changes during the postpartum period. Indeed, both OT (38) and OTRs (39) have steroid response elements, a putative target for how estrogen fluctuations during the peripartum period may impact transcriptional changes at OT- and OTR-containing cells.
We propose that estrogen withdrawal increases OT transmission between the PVH and DRN in order to increase anxiety during the postpartum period (Figure 5). The PVH sends moderate projections to the DRN, terminating primarily in the A10dc dopaminergic cell group (40). These dopaminergic DRN cells have been associated with arousal (41), and project to nuclei in the extended amygdala that are known to regulate anxiety (42,43). Recent work by Grieb et al (2019) demonstrates that approximately one third of these dopamine cells express OTRs, and the number and percentage of dopamine cells expressing OTRs are higher in postpartum rats than in diestrus virgin rats (35). In addition to dopaminergic cells, the raphe nuclei, including the DRN, are the primary source of forebrain-projecting serotonin neurons (44). Approximately half of raphe serotonin neurons contain OTRs, which modulate serotonin release to regulate anxiety (45). Given these neuroanatomical and functional substrates, it seems likely that estrogen withdrawal increases OT transmission between the PVH and the DRN to increase anxiety during the postpartum period, either by acting via direct synaptic contacts at dopaminergic neurons or via volume transmission (46) to serotonin neurons. Moving forward, experiments using chemogenetic inhibition of the PVH-DRN pathway are necessary to demonstrate its requirement for estrogen withdrawal-dependent increases in anxiety in the postpartum period. Ultimately, these data suggest a novel neural pathway in which peripartum estrogen fluctuations lead to neural plasticity that impacts postpartum affective behaviors.
Figure 5: Proposed Model.
Based on our data, we propose a model in which postpartum estrogen withdrawal increases oxytocin transmission between the PVH and DRN to increase anxiety-like behavior during the postpartum period. Specifically, we suggest that estrogen withdrawal leads to an increase in OT neurons in the PVH and a simultaneous increase in OTR density in the DRN, indicating a pathway-specific increase in OT neurotransmission. OT from the PVH may act via direct synaptic contact on dopamine (DA) neurons in the DRN to increases baseline arousal, or via volume transmission to serotonin (5-HT) neurons in the DRN to increase anxiety, during the early postpartum period.
Supplementary Material
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Resource Type | Specific Reagent or Resource | Source or Reference | Identifiers | Additional Information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Add additional rows as needed for each resource type | Include species and sex when applicable. | Include name of manufacturer, company, repository, individual, or research lab. Include PMID or DOI for references; use “this paper” if new. | Include catalog numbers, stock numbers, database IDs or accession numbers, and/or RRIDs. RRIDs are highly encouraged; search for RRIDs at https://scicrunch.org/resources. | Include any additional information or notes if necessary. |
Antibody | mouse monoclonal primary antibody against oxytocin | Millipore | Cat# MAB5296, RRID:AB_2157626 | |
Antibody | rabbit polyclonal antibody against NeuN | Millipore | Cat# ABN78, RRID:AB_10807945 | |
Chemical Compound or Drug | [d(CH2)51, Tyr(Me)2, Thr4, Orn8, des-Gly-NH29]OVT | doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02303.x | NA | provided by Maurice Manning to Elliott Albers |
Chemical Compound or Drug | I125-labeled ornithine vasotocin analog Vasotocin, d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2,Thr4,Orn8,[125I]Tyr9-NH2 | doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12882 | NA | provided by Elliott Albers to Laura Been |
Chemical Compound or Drug | Estradiol Benzoate | Sigma | Cat #P0130 | |
Chemical Compound or Drug | Progesterone | Sigma | Cat #E8875 | |
Sequence-Based Reagent | qPCR Primers for GAPDH | Eurofins Genomics | GenBank Accession ABD77188.1 | |
Sequence-Based Reagent | qPCR Primers for OT | Eurofins Genomics | GenBank Accession HM357357.1 | |
Commercial Assay Or Kit | Vectastain Elite ABC-Peroxidase Kit | Vector Laboratories | Cat# PK-6100, RRID:AB_2336819 | |
Commercial Assay Or Kit | RNAeasy Mini Kit | Quiagen | Cat # 74104 | |
Commercial Assay Or Kit | Transcriptor First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit | Roche | Cat # 04379012001 | |
Commercial Assay Or Kit | PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix | Applied Biosystems | Cat # A25741 |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Haley Bianco and Taylor Friendt for their assistance with sucrose preference data collection, and Nicholas Jones and Erin Haughee for their management of the Haverford College Vivarium. This work was supported in part by a Haverford College faculty research grant (LEB) and NIH grant R01MH110212 (HEA). Portions of this work were presented previously at the Society for Neuroscience and Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology annual meetings. This manuscript was submitted simultaneously to BiorXiv.org as a preprint.
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Hendrick V, Altshuler LL, Suri R (1998): Hormonal Changes in the Postpartum and Implications for Postpartum Depression. Psychosomatics 39: 93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McNeilly AS (2001): Lactational control of reproduction. Reprod Fertil Dev 13: 583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bloch M, Daly RC, Rubinow DR (2003): Endocrine factors in the etiology of postpartum depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry 44: 234–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sichel DA, Cohen LS, Robertson LM, Ruttenberg A, Rosenbaum JF (1995): Prophylactic estrogen in recurrent postpartum affective disorder. Biological Psychiatry 38: 814–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ahokas A, Kaukoranta J, Wahlbeck K, Aito M (2001): Estrogen Deficiency in Severe Postpartum Depression: Successful Treatment With Sublingual Physiologic 17b-Estradiol: A Preliminary Study. J Clin Psychiatry 62: 332–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gregoire AJP, Kumar R, Everitt B, Studd JWW (1996): Transdermal oestrogen for treatment of severe postnatal depression. The Lancet 347: 930–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galea LAM, Wide JK, Barr AM (2001): Estradiol alleviates depressive-like symptoms in a novel animal model of post-partum depression. Behavioural Brain Research 122: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Green AD, Barr AM, Galea LAM (2009): Role of estradiol withdrawal in “anhedonic” sucrose consumption: a model of postpartum depression. Physiol Behav 97: 259–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schiller CE, O’Hara MW, Rubinow DR, Johnson AK (2013): Estradiol modulates anhedonia and behavioral despair in rats and negative affect in a subgroup of women at high risk for postpartum depression. Physiology & Behavior 119: 137–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stoffel EC, Craft RM (2004): Ovarian hormone withdrawal-induced “depression” in female rats. Physiol Behav 83: 505–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Suda S, Segi-Nishida E, Newton SS, Duman RS (2008): A Postpartum Model in Rat: Behavioral and Gene Expression Changes Induced by Ovarian Steroid Deprivation. Biological Psychiatry 64: 311–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Navarre BM, Laggart JD, Craft RM (2010): Anhedonia in postpartum rats. Physiology & Behavior 99: 59–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baka J, Csakvari E, Huzian O, Dobos N, Siklos L, Leranth C, et al. (2017): Stress induces equivalent remodeling of hippocampal spine synapses in a simulated postpartum environment and in a female rat model of major depression. Neuroscience 343: 384–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Z, Hong J, Zhang S, Zhang T, Sha S, Yang R, et al. (2016): Postpartum estrogen withdrawal impairs hippocampal neurogenesis and causes depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 66: 138–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang R, Zhang B, Chen T, Zhang S, Chen L (2017): Postpartum estrogen withdrawal impairs GABAergic inhibition and LTD induction in basolateral amygdala complex via down-regulation of GPR30. European Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 759–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qin C, Li J, Tang K (2018): The Paraventricular Nucleus of the Hypothalamus: Development, Function, and Human Diseases. Endocrinology 159: 3458–3472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brunton PJ, Russell JA (2010): Endocrine induced changes in brain function during pregnancy. Brain Res 1364: 198–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jurek B, Neumann ID (2018): The Oxytocin Receptor: From Intracellular Signaling to Behavior. Physiological Reviews 98: 1805–1908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ross AP, McCann KE, Larkin TE, Song Z, Grieb ZA, Huhman KL, Albers HE (2019): Sex-dependent effects of social isolation on the regulation of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) V1a, oxytocin (OT) and serotonin (5HT) 1a receptor binding and aggression. Horm Behav 116: 104578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McCarthy MM (1995): Estrogen modulation of oxytocin and its relation to behavior. Adv Exp Med Biol 395: 235–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rosenblatt JS, Mayer AD, Giordano AL (1988): Hormonal basis during pregnancy for the onset of maternal behavior in the rat. Psychoneuroendocrinology 13: 29–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Siegel HI, Rosenblatt JS (1975): Estrogen-induced maternal behavior in hysterectomized-overiectomized virgin rats. Physiol Behav 14: 465–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mayer AD, Ahdieh HB, Rosenblatt JS (1990): Effects of prolonged estrogen-progesterone treatment and hypophysectomy on the stimulation of short-latency maternal behavior and aggression in female rats. Horm Behav 24: 152–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Siegel HI, Rosenblatt JS (1980): Hormonal and behavioral aspects of maternal care in the hamster: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 4: 17–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gannon RL, Lungwitz E, Batista N, Hester I, Huntley C, Peacock A, et al. (2011): The benzodiazepine diazepam demonstrates the usefulness of Syrian hamsters as a model for anxiety testing: Evaluation of other classes of anxiolytics in comparison to diazepam. Behavioural Brain Research 218: 8–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Manning M, Misicka A, Olma A, Bankowski K, Stoev S, Chini B, et al. (2012): Oxytocin and Vasopressin Agonists and Antagonists as Research Tools and Potential Therapeutics: Oxytocin and vasopressin agonists and antagonists. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 24: 609–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Morin LP, Wood RI (2001): A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Golden Hamster Brain. San Diego, Calif.; London: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gilbert AN (1984): Postpartum and lactational estrus: A comparative analysis in rodentia. Journal of Comparative Psychology 98: 232–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Feigin MB, Sclafani A, Sunday SR (1987): Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 11: 231–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.National Research Council (U.S.) (Ed.) (1995): Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals, 4th rev. ed. Washington, D.C: National Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Caldwell JD, Greer R, Johnson MF, Prange AJ Jr., Pedersen CA (1987): Oxytocin and Vasopressin Immunoreactivity in Hypothalamic and Extrahypothalamic Sites in Late Pregnant and Postpartum Rats. Neuroendocrinology 46: 39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jirikowski GF, Caldwell JD, Pilgrim C, Stumpf WE, Pedersen CA (1989): Changes in immunostaining for oxytocin in the forebrain of the female rat during late pregnancy, parturition and early lactation. Cell Tissue Res 256: 411–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Caba M, Silver R, González-Mariscal G, Jiménez A, Beyer C (1996): Oxytocin and vasopressin immunoreactivity in rabbit hypothalamus during estrus, late pregnancy, and postpartum. Brain Res 720: 7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Broad KD, Kendrick KM, Sirinathsinghji DJS, Keverne EB (1993): Changes in Oxytocin Immunoreactivity and mRNA Expression in the Sheep Brain during Pregnancy, Parturition and Lactation and in Response to Oestrogen and Progesterone. J Neuroendocrinol 5: 435–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grieb ZA, Ford EG, Manfredsson FP, Lonstein JS (2019): Dorsal Raphe Oxytocin Receptors Regulate the Neurobehavioral Consequences of Social Touch. Neuroscience. 10.1101/850271 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Steinman MQ, Duque-Wilckens N, Trainor BC (2019): Complementary Neural Circuits for Divergent Effects of Oxytocin: Social Approach Versus Social Anxiety. Biological Psychiatry 85: 792–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yip SH, Romanò N, Gustafson P, Hodson DJ, Williams EJ, Kokay IC, et al. (2019): Elevated Prolactin during Pregnancy Drives a Phenotypic Switch in Mouse Hypothalamic Dopaminergic Neurons. Cell Reports 26: 1787–1799.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Burbach JPH, Luckman SM, Murphy D, Gainer H (2001): Gene Regulation in the Magnocellular Hypothalamo-Neurohypophysial System. Physiological Reviews 81: 1197–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bale TL, Dorsa DM (1998): Transcriptional Regulation of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene. In: Zingg HH, Bourque CW, Bichet DG, editors. Vasopressin and Oxytocin, vol. 449. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp 307–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Geerling JC, Shin J-W, Chimenti PC, Loewy AD (2010): Paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus: Axonal projections to the brainstem. J Comp Neurol 518: 1460–1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu J, Jhou TC, Saper CB (2006): Identification of wake-active dopaminergic neurons in the ventral periaqueductal gray matter. J Neurosci 26: 193–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hasue RH, Shammah-Lagnado SJ (2002): Origin of the dopaminergic innervation of the central extended amygdala and accumbens shell: A combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 454: 15–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shin J-W, Geerling JC, Loewy AD (2008): Inputs to the ventrolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. J Comp Neurol 511: 628–657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Abrams JK, Johnson PL, Hollis JH, Lowry CA (2004): Anatomic and Functional Topography of the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1018: 46–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yoshida M, Takayanagi Y, Inoue K, Kimura T, Young LJ, Onaka T, Nishimori K (2009): Evidence that oxytocin exerts anxiolytic effects via oxytocin receptor expressed in serotonergic neurons in mice. J Neurosci 29: 2259–2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ludwig M, Stern J (2015): Multiple signalling modalities mediated by dendritic exocytosis of oxytocin and vasopressin. Phil Trans R Soc B 370: 20140182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Siegel HI (1985): The Hamster: Reproduction and Behavior. Boston, MA: Springer US : Imprint : Springer. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3084363 [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ross AP, Norvelle A, Choi DC, Walton JC, Albers HE, Huhman KL (2017): Social housing and social isolation: Impact on stress indices and energy balance in male and female Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Physiol Behav 177: 264–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bridges RS (1984): A Quantitative Analysis of the Roles of Dosage, Sequence, and Duration of Estradiol and Progesterone Exposure in the Regulation of Maternal Behavior in the Rat *. Endocrinology 114: 930–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Garland HO, Atherton JC, Baylis C, Morgan MRA, Milne CM (1987): Hormone profiles for progesterone, oestradiol, prolactin, plasma renin activity, aldosterone and corticosterone during pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in two strains of rat: correlation with renal studies. Journal of Endocrinology 113: 435–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cooper MA, Grober MS, Nicholas CR, Huhman KL (2009): Aggressive encounters alter the activation of serotonergic neurons and the expression of 5-HT1A mRNA in the hamster dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuroscience 161: 680–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Harmon AC, Huhman KL, Moore TO, Albers HE (2002): Oxytocin Inhibits Aggression in Female Syrian Hamsters: Oxytocin inhibits aggression in female Syrian hamsters. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 14: 963–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Martinez LA, Albers HE, Petrulis A (2010): Blocking oxytocin receptors inhibits vaginal marking to male odors in female Syrian hamsters. Physiology & Behavior 101: 685–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Taylor JH, McCann KE, Ross AP, Albers HE (2020): Binding affinities of oxytocin, vasopressin and Manning compound at oxytocin and V1a receptors in male Syrian hamster brains. J Neuroendocrinol 32. 10.1111/jne.12882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dabrowska J, Hazra R, Ahern TH, Guo J-D, McDonald AJ, Mascagni F, et al. (2011): Neuroanatomical evidence for reciprocal regulation of the corticotrophin-releasing factor and oxytocin systems in the hypothalamus and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the rat: Implications for balancing stress and affect. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36: 1312–1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.