Table 2.
Variables | PA (n=70), n (%) |
---|---|
Probable reason for initiation of tapentadol | |
Substitute for the usual opioid | 50 (71.4) |
Pain management | 2 (2.9) |
Augmenting the psychoactive effect of the usual opioid | 5 (7.1) |
Started with tapentadol itself | 6 (8.6) |
Prescribed/took for withdrawal management | 7 (10.0) |
Substitution for opioid | |
None | 8 (11.4) |
Natural | 8 (11.4) |
Heroin (chasing and intravenous) | 34 (48.6) |
Tramadol | 13 (18.6) |
Others | 7 (10) |
Psychoactive effect of tapentadol | |
Better than usual opioid | 4 (5.7) |
Same to the usual opioid | 6 (8.6) |
Inferior to the usual opioid | 51 (72.9) |
Started with tapentadol only | 8 (11.4) |
Different | 1 (1.4) |
Was tapentadol prescribed by physician? | |
No | 43 (61.4) |
Yes | 27 (38.6) |
Possible current source of tapentadol | |
Friend | 20 (28.6) |
Chemist | 37 (52.9) |
Peddler | 11 (15.7) |
Other | 2 (2.9) |
Pattern of tapentadol use | |
Misuse/abuse | 36 (51.4) |
Dependence | 34 (48.6) |
PA – Prospective arm