Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 12;62(6):697–702. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_332_20

Table 3.

Comparison between patients with misuse/abuse and those with dependence to tapentadol with regard to characteristics and patterns of use of tapentadol

Variable Misuse/abuse (n=36), n (%)/mean (SD)/rank Dependence (n=34), n (%)/mean (SD)/rank Chi-square/Fisher’s exact/t/Mann-Whitney U value df P
Age of onset of tapentadol (years) 26.5 (6.4) 26.4 (6.9) 0.075 68 0.941
Duration of use (months) 7.2 (8.1) 13.7 (10.1) 877 0.002
Daily dose (mg) 248.6 (130.8) 820.3 (531.0) −6.264 68 <0.001
Route of use
 Oral 36 (100) 31 (91.18) 3.319 1 0.109
 Intravenous 0 3 (8.82)
Brand
 Tapal 18 (50) 19 (55.88) 0.24 1 0.62
 Others 18 (50) 15 (44.12)
Reason
 Substitution 27 (75) 23 (67.65) 0.463 1 0.50
 Other 9 (25) 11 (32.35)
Concurrent opioid use
 Natural 4 (11.11) 3 (8.82) 10.828 2 0.004
 Heroin 25 (69.44) 7 (20.59)
 Others 6 (16.67) 13 (38.24)
Substitution of opioids
 None 3 (8.11) 5 (14.71) 8.364 2 0.015
 Heroin 23 (63.89) 10 (29.41)
 Pharmaceutical and natural 10 (27.78) 19 (55.88)
Prescribed by physician
 No 16 (44.44) 27 (79.41) 9.023 1 0.003
 Yes 20 (55.56) 7 (20.59)
Source
 Chemists 24 (66.67) 13 (38.24) 5.67 1 0.017
 Friends and peddlers 12 (33.33) 21 (61.76)
Psychoactive effect of tapentadol
 Inferior 35 (97.22) 24 (70.59) 9.365 1 0.002
 Not inferior 1 (2.78) 10 (29.41)
Psychiatric illness
 Absent 35 (97.22) 27 (79.41) 5.48 1 0.019
 Present 1 (2.78) 7 (20.58)

SD – Standard deviation