Table 3. Analysis of proposed approach (MuLeHyABSC) for different approaches on testing model STC.

The bold emphasis shows the highest results achieved by the proposed approach.

Sr. No.	Approach	Features	Accuracy (%)	Precision	Recall	F-score
1	MuLeHyABSC+MLP	POS tags + unigram	78.99	0.79	0.789	0.789
2	MuLeHyABSC+SVC	POS tags + unigram	75.79	0.758	0.757	0.757
3	MuLeHyABSC+LR	POS tags + unigram	72.08	0.712	0.722	0.716
4	MuLeHyABSC+DT	POS tags + unigram	73.02	0.725	0.732	0.728
5	MuLeHyABSC+KN	POS tags + unigram	70.16	0.714	0.721	0.717
6	MuLeHyABSC+RF	POS tags + unigram	72.08	0.712	0.722	0.716
7	MuLeHyABSC+AB	POS tags + unigram	75.34	0.755	0.753	0.752
8	MuLeHyABSC+ETC	POS tags + unigram	76.02	0.765	0.762	0.76
9	MuLeHyABSC+GB	POS tags + unigram	74.71	0.738	0.727	0.732
10	MuLeHyABSC+NB	POS tags + unigram	67.57	0.702	0.675	0.659