Table 4.
Variables a b c | Gender non-conforming | Transgender | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | P | AOR | 95% CI | B | P | AOR | 95% CI | |
Multiple sexual partners (yes) | −0.13 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.43–1.80 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 1.13 | 0.51–2.52 |
Male partner type | ||||||||
All were regular partners/acquaintances | ref | ref | ||||||
All were one-night stand/occasional partners | 0.16 | 0.78 | 1.17 | 0.38–3.64 | 1.25 | 0.047 | 3.49 | 1.02–11.98 |
Both regular partners/acquaintances and one-night stand/occasional partners | 0.12 | 0.78 | 1.12 | 0.49–2.56 | 0.73 | 0.18 | 2.08 | 0.71–6.09 |
Sex after drugs (yes) | −0.17 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.30–2.39 | 0.94 | 0.04 | 2.57 | 1.05–6.29 |
Sex after drinking (yes) | −0.49 | 0.20 | 0.61 | 0.29–1.30 | −0.04 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.43–2.18 |
Commercial sexual behavior (yes) | 0.55 | 0.65 | 1.73 | 0.17–18.00 | 1.71 | 0.06 | 5.51 | 0.91–33.39 |
Inconsistent condom use (yes) | 0.58 | 0.16 | 1.79 | 0.79–4.08 | 0.08 | 0.86 | 1.09 | 0.43–2.78 |
AOR adjust odds ratio, CI confidence interval; bolded value indicated P < 0.05
aAll models controlled for age, ethnicity, educational level, marital status, employment status, monthly income, sexual orientation, depression, perceived social support, resilience and identity concealment
bHosmer and Lemeshow Test: multiple sexual partners, Chi-square = 7.69, df = 8, P = 0.47; sex after drug, Chi-square = 7.26, df = 8, P = 0.51; sex after drinking, Chi-square = 4.85, df = 8, P = 0.77; commercial sexual behaviors, Chi-square = 2.24, df = 8, P = 0.97; inconsistent condom use, Chi-square = 2.52, df = 8, P = 0.96. Model fit of male partner types: -2Log likelihood =1156.90, Chi-square = 51.378, df = 26, p = 0.002; Cox and Snell square = 0.08, Nagelkerke square = 0.09, McFadden = 0.04
cgender identity was independent variable and Reference Category were cisgender MSM