Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;80(5):651–659. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218881

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison between the antigen-binding bead assay and conventional methods; ANA test and anti-CENP-B antibody by ELISA. (A) The numbers of antibodies with positivity in sera were plotted against the titres of anti-CENP-B antibody. Linear regression lines, the correlation coefficient, and p value of the regression line are shown. The dotted line indicates cut-off value by ELISA. (B) Number of individuals with and without bead assay positivity depending on various cut-off values. (C) Pie charts show positive rates for anti-CENP-B antibody by ELISA and the centromere antigen-binding bead assay. Having two or more antibodies against centromere antigens was considered as positive. Individuals who were additionally identified as ACA positive by the bead assay are shown by blue. ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HC, healthy controls.