Table 2.
Author(s) | Year of publication | Location | Aims/purpose | Sample size | Methodology | Exposure (s) | Outcome (s) | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantitative studies | ||||||||
Kaston D. Anderson-Carpenter, et al. [36] |
2019 | All 50 US states, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico | To examine associations between perceived homophobia, community connectedness, and having a health care provider among men who have sex with men (MSM) | 2281 MSM | Cross-sectional | Perceived Homophobia | Having a regular health care provider | 1. Greater level of perceived community level homophobia were associated with a lower likelihood of having a health care provider |
Alexandra B. Balaji, et al. [37] |
2017 | Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; Dallas, Texas; Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, California; Miami, Florida; Nassau, New York; Newark, New Jersey; New Orleans, Louisiana; New York City, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Diego, California; San Francisco, California; San Juan, Puerto Rico; Seattle, Washington; and Washington, District of Columbia | To examine the association between measures of enacted stigma (related to sexual minority) and HIV-related risk behaviors | 9819 MSM | Cross-sectional; NHBS | Enacted Stigma: verbal harassment, discrimination, physical assault | HIV-related risk behaviors: CAI at last sex with a male partner of HIV discordant or unknown status and the past 12-month measures of CAI with a male partner, four or more male sexual partners, and exchange sex | 1. A sizable proportion of participants had experienced some form of enacted stigma related to sexual minority status in the past 12 months; 2. Age was strongly related to the risk of victimization (more for younger ones); 3. No association between self-reported HIV status and any of the enacted stigma measures |
Abigail W. Batcheldera, et al. [56] |
2020 | Boston, Massachusetts | To examine sexual orientation discrimination and HIV stigma in relation to condom less anal sex among MSM | 382 MSM | Cross-sectional; NHBS | Sexual orientation discrimination, HIV related stigma | Sexual risk (number of condom less anal sex male partners in the past 12 months) | 1. Substance use was associated with health care discrimination and physical assault; 2. Substance use and both forms of discrimination were associated with more condom less anal sex; 3. Hispanic MSM reported more workplace discrimination |
Adolph Joseph Delgado, et al. [38] |
2016 | USA | To increase the body of knowledge on the sexual and behavioral health among gay and bisexual servicemen while investigating whether heteronormative roles and expectations led to discrimination and psychological stress. Further analyses were conducted to determine if stress and discrimination that negatively impacted negative health behaviors (i.e., using tobacco, drinking alcohol) and risky sexual behavior (i.e., having casual sex partners) | 85 GB service men | Cross-sectional | Discrimination and psychological stress | Negative health behaviors (i.e., drugs, tobacco, and alcohol) and risky sexual behaviors | 1. Gay and Bi servicemen reported experiencing discrimination more often than straight; 2. Sexual orientation is a significant predictor of tobacco use, alcohol use, and casual sex |
Susan A. Fallon, et al. [24] |
2017 | Baltimore | To examine correlates of PrEP awareness and willingness to use PrEP | 399 MSM | Cross-sectional | Discrimination and stigma | PrEP awareness and PrEP use | 1. Black was associated with decreased awareness of PrEP; 2. People who perceived discrimination against HIV were less likely to hear of PrEP but more likely to take it; 3. Perception of HIV intolerance is a barrier for MSM to accessing HIV prevention; 4. HIV-related stigma influence PrEP use |
Catherine Finneran, et al. [39] |
2014 | USA | To explore the associations between minority stress and both intimate partner violence and sexual risk-taking | 1575 MSM | Cross-sectional | Internalized homophobia index, homophobic discrimination index, racist discrimination index | Experienced Physical Violence, experienced sexual violence, perpetrated physical violence, perpetrated sexual violence, unprotected anal sex | 1. Minority stress has significant associations with sexual violence; 2. Non-white race, low education, HIV Positive have significant associations with violence and sexual risk; 3. The bidirectional association between perpetration of sexual intimate partner violence and unprotected anal intercourse at last sex; 4. No association of homophobia and HIV risk |
Victoria Frye, et al. [40] |
2015 | NYC | To assess the relationship between sexual orientation and race-based experiences of discrimination and sexual HIV risk behavior | 1369 MSM | Cross-sectional | Experience of race- and sexual orientation-based discrimination | HIV acquisition risk behavior, HIV transmission risk behavior | 1. self-reported experience of sexual orientation-based discrimination only within the past 3 months that was significantly associated with sexual HIV acquisition risk behavior; 2. Psychological distress and alcohol and/or drug use before/during last sex, were associated with the outcome, but not internalized homophobia |
Tamar Goldenberg, et al. [41] |
2018 | Detroit | To understand and address the social and structural factors influencing HIV/AIDS among Black and Latino YMSM | 334 YMSM | Cross-sectional survey | Perceived community prejudice, internalized homonegativity (IH), experience of sexuality-related discrimination | Three outcomes for HIV testing were examined: testing for HIV in 2012; previously testing for HIV, but not in 2012; and never testing for HIV | 1. Higher perceived sexuality prejudice with higher odds of HIV testing, but not associated with timing since last test; 2. IH was negatively associated with likelihood of testing for HIV; 3. No association between stigma and recency of HIV testing among YMSM who had tested in the past |
Michael A. Hoyt, et al. [42] |
2012 | Central Arizona | To investigate relationships between institutional mistrust, HIV risk behaviors, and HIV testing | 394 MSM | Longitudinal study | Institutional Mistrust (systematic discrimination, organizational suspicion, conspiracy beliefs), perceived susceptibility to HIV | Sexual risk behaviors | 1. Perceptions of systematic discrimination were related to lower likelihood of having received HIV testing; 2. Among minority, conspiracy beliefs impact HIV risk behaviors; 3. Higher levels of mistrust are more detrimental to minority MSM, resulting in increased risk-taking behavior, less testing |
William L. Jeffries 4th, et al. [43] |
2013 | NYC and Philadelphia | To examine the association of the experience of homophobic and whether social integration level affects the association | 1140 Black MSM | Cross-sectional | Homophobia; social integration | Sexual risk behaviors such as unprotected anal sex | 1. People experienced homophobic events are more likely to have UAI than people did not; 2. For people not diagnosed of HIV positive before, being bullied increases their UAI; 3. For people diagnosed of HIV positive before, all type of homophobic events increase their HIV transmission; 4. Social integration cannot mitigate the association of homophobia and UAI |
Leslie E. Kooyman [44] |
2008 |
South USA-Charlotte, North Carolina; Columbia, South Carolina; and, Nashville, Tennessee |
To examine the predictive value of peer norms, self-efficacy, stigma, social support, age, and recreational drug use on high-risk sexual behavior | 576 gay and MSM | Cross-sectional | Stigma | High-risk sexual behaviors | 1. Low peers’ norms for safer sex, low self-efficacy, greater family, and community stigma, being younger in age, and greater drug use do predict higher risk sexual behavior; 2. Predictors might be interrelated |
Jessica L. Maksut, et al. [45] |
2018 | Southeast USA |
1. To determine the extent of PrEP awareness among BMSM; 2. to examine whether perceived healthcare-related discrimination, disclosure of same-sex sex behavior to a healthcare provider, and participants’ age were related to PrEP awareness among BMSM; and whether age moderated the relationship between perceived healthcare-related discrimination and PrEP awareness |
147 BMSM | Cross-sectional | Perceived healthcare related discrimination, disclosure of same-sex behavior | PrEP awareness | 1. Perceived healthcare related discrimination was significantly negatively associated with PrEP awareness; 2. Same sex behavior disclosure was significantly positively associated with PrEP awareness; 3. Older BMSM were significantly less aware of PrEP as an HIV prevention strategy than were their younger counterparts; 4. Age moderated the relationship between perceived healthcare related discrimination and PrEP awareness |
Henry F Raymond, et al. [28] |
2011 | San Francisco | To examine the association of negative life factors during adolescence and adult HIV status | 521 MSM | Cross-sectional | Adolescent life course negative factors: disconnected, discriminated, harassed, uncomfortable | Adult HIV status | 1. There were high level of ever being harassed, ever being discriminated, and ever feeling disconnected from community and being uncomfortable with sexuality [12-18yrs]; 2. Higher harassment experiences, higher discrimination, and higher discomfort at ages 12–18 are associated with HIV Neg status as adult; 3. Black MSM do not experience more negative life course factors that others |
John E. Pachankis, et al. [47] |
2016 | NYC | To investigate migration-related motivations, experiences, health risks | 273 YGBM | Cross-sectional | Hometown characteristics (size, USA or not, structural stigma, discrimination), experiences upon arrival (income, gay density, knew no one in NYC, recently arrived), migration motivations (escape, opportunity, work/school) | HIV transmission risk behavior; heavy drug use; alcohol use; mental health problems | 1. Hometown interpersonal discrimination was strongly related to all assessed health risks, including HIV transmission risk, heavy substance use, alcohol use problems, and mental health problems, although hometown structural stigma climate was associated with lower odds of heavy drug use; 2. There is an inverse association between hometown structural stigma and substance use |
Catherine E. Oldenburg, et al. [46] |
2016 | Boston | To assess PrEP awareness, use, and intent to use among those who reported engaging in condom less anal intercourse in the context of stimulant and/or alcohol use | 254 MSM | Cross-sectional | Substance use | PrEP awareness and use | 1. Stimulant-using MSM reported engaging in higher risk sex more often than alcohol-using MSM; 2. For alcohol users, HIV stigma is a limiting factor in PrEP use; 3. Significant association between type of substance used and concern about HIV stigma; 5. Black MSM are more concerned of HIV stigma |
Kellie Schueler, et al. [48] |
2019 | Chicago |
1. To characterize HIV-positive index participants and the members of their potential transmission networks; 2. To understand how behavioral factors, PrEP use within networks, and experiences of stigma and community support are associated with awareness and use of PrEP among transmission network members |
218 MSM | Cross-sectional | Stigma, support, HIV status, HIV test, HIV knowledge | PrEP awareness and PrEP use | 1. Individuals who were aware of PrEP were more likely to identify as gay, be highly educated, engaged in health care, and have HIV-related social support; 2. PrEP users were more likely to know other PrEP users |
Ja’Nina J. Walker, et al. [49] |
2015 | NYC | To understand the ways in which racial and sexual identities may serve as buffers to risky sexual behavior | 120 Black GBM | Cross-sectional | Racial identities, sexual identities | Risky sexual behavior | 1. Racial identity was associated with sexual risk behavior; 2. There is no association of sexual identity and sexual risk behavior |
Jennifer L. Walsh [50] |
2019 | Midwestern US | To explore factors associated with PrEP intentions and use | 476 MSM | Cross-sectional | PrEP knowledge, PrEP attitudes, PrEP stigma, PrEP descriptive norms, PrEP subjective norms, PrEP self-efficacy | PrEP intention and use | 1. Information (PrEP knowledge); motivation (PrEP attitudes, PrEP stigma, and PrEP descriptive norms); and behavioral skills (PrEP self-efficacy) all had associations with PrEP use; 2. PrEP knowledge was directly associated with PrEP use; 3. Latino MSM were less knowledgeable about PrEP than White and Black MSM; 4. Self-efficacy for PrEP use was positively associated with PrEP use and PrEP intention |
Sari L Reisner, et al. [52] |
2019 | US | To assess PrEP indication and uptake as a means of primary HIV prevention | 857 trans MSM | Cross-sectional | PrEP awareness, uptake, and persistence | PrEP indications | 1. Majority heard of PrEP, but PrEP uptake was low and PrEP indications were high; 2. Higher perceived HIV risk was found to be associated with increased odds of PrEP indication; 3. Higher partner stigma was associated with increased odds of PrEP indications |
Katie Wang, et al. [54] |
2016 | NYC | To investigate associations among gay-related rejection sensitivity, condom use self-efficacy, and condom less anal sex | 63 MSM | Cross-sectional | Gay-related rejection sensitivity, safer sex self-efficacy | Condom less anal sex | 1. Gay related rejection were positively associated with the number of condom less anal sex acts with casual partners; 2. Gay-related rejection sensitivity was associated with lower self-efficacy for condom use, which in turn predicted a higher number of condom less anal sex acts |
Erik D. Storholm, et al. [53] |
2019 | Dallas and Houston |
To assess the mediating effects of gay pride/self-esteem, resilience, and social support on the relationship between stressful experiences of racism and homophobia, stimulant use, and sexual risk behavior |
1817 YBMSM | Cross-sectional | Minority stress (experienced homophobia, experienced racism, internalized homophobia) | Sexual risk behavior | 1. Minority stress was significantly and directly associated with sexual risk behavior; 2. Stimulant use was associated with sexual risk behavior; 3. There is no association between minority stress and stimulant use; 4. Minority stress was found to be negatively associated with sources of resilience |
Hirokazu Yoshikawa, et al. [55] |
2004 | Northeastern city, USA | To examine the influence of experiences of racism, homophobia, and anti-immigrant discrimination on depressive symptoms and HIV risk | 192 Asian and Pacific Islander MSM | Cross-sectional | Experience of discrimination (racism, homophobia, anti-immigrant discrimination) | Depressive symptoms, HIV risk (UAI) | 1. Experiences of discrimination and conversations about discrimination with family members were somewhat associated with both depression and HIV risk; 2. Conversations with gay friends and with family members about discrimination were associated with lower levels of UAI with primary partners; 3. High levels of discrimination + low levels of conversations with family about discrimination was associated with the highest levels of UAI; 4. Low levels of racism + low levels of family discussions was related to highest levels of secondary-partner UAI |
Sharon Mannheimer, et al. [51] |
2014 | Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA; New York, NY; Los Angeles, CA; San Francisco, CA; and Washington, D.C | To assess frequency and correlates of infrequent HIV testing and late diagnosis | 1301 Black MSM | Cross-sectional | Internalized HIV stigma, employment status, housing status, seeing a health care provider | Late HIV diagnosis | 1. Infrequent testing was associated with higher frequency of newly diagnosed HIV infection compared to that among BMSM tested in the prior 12 months and was not associated with lower CD4 or late diagnosis; 2. Unemployment, not seeing health care provider, high internalized HIV stigma are independently associated with infrequent testing |
Qualitative studies | ||||||||
Derek T. Dangerfield li, et al. [61] |
2018 | LA | To inform the development of an intervention for promoting HIV and STI testing, prevention, and treatment | 24 Black MSM | 5 Focus groups | Barriers and facilitators | HIV testing | 1. Fear, stigma and drug use are barriers to HIV testing; 2. Symptoms, new relationships, perceptions of risk, community HIV prevalence and peer navigators are motivations to HIV testing |
Joseph P. De Santis, et al. [62] |
2014 | Florida | To describe the relationship of risky sexual behavior, substance abuse, and violence within the cultural context | 20 Latino MSM | Focus group | Roots of risk: acculturation, culture, discrimination, economics, immigration issues, peer influences, unstable intimate relationships | Burden of violence, substance abusers as a buffer, negation of sexual risk | 1. Acculturation to mainstream U.S. culture could be both a risk and protective factor for the acquisition of HIV infection; 2. Internal and external sources of discrimination resulted in stress that was mitigated by high-risk sexual behaviors and substance abuse, and sometimes IPV; 3. Economic factors, unstable intimate relationships and access to psychological support contributed to high-risk sex, substance abuse, and violence |
Maria Knight Lapinski, et al. [67] |
2010 | Michigan | To addresses the functional role of stigma in human social systems and the nature of the Down Low phenomenon | 32 for Interviews, Black MSM, 24 for focus group, BMSM, | Interview, focus groups | Stigma | Down low (closet), sexual risk | 1. Organized religion was viewed as a source of expressing stigma around sex and sexuality; 2. Stigma and discrimination are linked to sexual risk behaviors, mainly in health information and information seeking |
David J. Malebranche, et al. [68] |
2004 | NY State; Atlanta | To assess healthcare experiences of BMSM and the perceived influence of their race and sexuality on these experiences; (2) perceived barriers to healthcare utilization and (3) factors affecting adherence in this population | 81 BMSM | 8 Focus groups | Racial and sexual prejudice; external barriers (money, insurance, lack confidentiality, impersonal medical system); internal barriers (distrust, fear, discrimination) | Access to medical care | 1. Experiences with societal and institutional racism, and the subsequent expectation of medical racism, impacts how open BMSM are with providers about their sexuality; 2. Internalized displacement makes healthcare access difficult |
José Nanín, et al. [63] |
2009 | NYC | To identify participants’ experiences with and attitudes and other factors toward HIV testing | 29 BMSM | Focus group | Fear, stigma, universality of messages, responsibility, sexuality, religion, race and class, knowledge, media influences | HIV Testing | 1. How to overcome barriers to HIV testing: hiring and retention of competent testing personnel, use of more focused, competent, community relevant messages in HIV testing |
Jennifer R. Pharr, et al. [64] |
2015 | Nevada | To identify barriers as well as facilitators to HIV testing so as to inform future interventions to increase testing among this group | 11 YMSM | Semi-structured focus group | Barriers: lack of awareness and knowledge, fear, lack of self-esteem, access problems, stigma, unfriendly environment; Facilitators: fear about having HIV, access, friendly environment | HIV Testing | 1. The greatest barrier is lack of awareness and knowledge and the perception of stigma is a major barrier; 2. Friendly environment is important facilitator |
Whitney S. Rice, et al. [65] |
2019 | Birmingham, Alabama | To explore perceptions of PrEP access among current and potential PrEP users; to assess the effects of stigma on PrEP uptake an adherence | 44 MSM | Semi-structured interviews | Barriers and facilitators (approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, appropriateness) | PrEP use | 1. Barriers: lack of awareness particularly within communities of color; 2. Facilitators: PrEP-related information gathering and sharing, making PrEP more approachable, social support networks, cost assistance programs, and clinical support staff |
Karolynn Siegel, et al. [66] |
1989 | NYC | To explore the motives of gay men for taking or not taking HIV test | 120 MSM | Unstructured focused interviews | Motives | HIV Testing |
To test: 1. To enable medical treatment for HIV infection and to inform sexual decision making; 2. to relieve the psychological distress associated with not knowing HIV status; To not test: 1. To avoid the adverse psychological impact of being positive and to avoid social discrimination |
Thomas Alex Washington, et al. [25] |
2015 | LA | To explore the barriers and challenges to HIV testing uptake behavior | 36 Black YMSM | Focus group | Barriers to HIV testing (lack of knowledge for HIV testing; anxiety and substance use; lack of peer support; stigma; perceptions about HIV testing and treatment facilities | HIV testing | 1. Young BMSM are drinking alcohol before and during sex, and as a result having condom less sex; thus, increasing their risk for HIV |
Joseph P. Stokes, et al. [69] |
1998 | Atlanta and Chicago | To examine the relationship of negative attitudes toward homosexuality, self-esteem, and risk for HIV | 76 Black MSM | Interview | Homophobia | HIV risk | 1. Fear of being perceived as gay or bisexual can lead some men to avoid showing interest in information about HIV and AIDS or to avoid discussing using condoms |