Table 3.
Comparison of published salvage radical prostatectomy series.
| Author | Year | Patients; n | Approach | BCR % | PSM% | LN +, % | Overall urinary incontience % | Overall anastomotic stricture % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eandi21 | 2010 | 18 | Robotic | 67 | 28 | 5.5 | 67 | 17 |
| Heidenreich9 | 2010 | 55 | Open/lap | 87 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 11 |
| Chade17 | 2011 | 404 | Open | 37 | 25 | 16 | - | - |
| Zugor22 | 2014 | 13 | Robotic | 46 | 0 | - | 46 | 0 |
| Kenney23 | 2016 | 39 | Open/robotic | 30 | 15.3 | 12.8 | 25.6 | |
| Gontero5 | 2019 | 395 | Open/robotic | - | - | 15.7 | 42.5 | 11.85 |
| Present Study | 2020 | 76 | Open/robotic | 67 | 28.9 | 6.6 | 26.4 | 8.8 |
BCR: biochemical recurrence; PSM: positive surgical margin; LN+: lymph node involved; Lap: laparoscopic.