Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;24(3):321–349. doi: 10.1177/1368430219888274

Table 1.

Exclusions and participant demographics by experiment.

Pilot
Experiment 1
Experiment 2
n % n % n %
Nonparticipants 225 106 269
 Ineligible 222 99 105 99 260 97
 Duplicate 3 1 1 1 9 3
All participants 315 272 669
 Incomplete 21 7 30 11 78 12
 Listed no friends 10 3 9 3 27 4
 Withdrew consent 4 1 1 < 1 11 2
Final sample 280 232 553
Mean age (years) 20 20 20
Participant type
 Men in STEM majors 123 44 123 53 240 43
 Women in STEM majors 44 16 50 22 117 21
 Women in non-STEM majors 113 40 59 25 196 35
Participant race
 White 160 57 140 60 334 60
 East Asian 120 43 92 40 219 40
Experimental condition
 STEM-stereotypic profile 141 50 116 50 265 48
 Feminine-stereotypic profile 139 50 116 50 288 52

Note. Ineligible individuals were redirected automatically out of the survey. Duplicate submissions (from the same person) within each experiment were omitted. Among the eligible, unique participants, analyses excluded submissions that were incomplete (missing all friendship intentions data), listed no friends (with no friends, some questions had invalid response options), or withdrew consent (after debriefing). Across studies and in descending order, participants came from the following STEM majors (with ⩽ 20% female enrollment): engineering (mechatronics, software, nanotechnology, mechanical, computer), computer science, electrical engineering, physics, and pure math; and non-STEM majors (with ⩾ 65% female enrollment): psychology; social development; health; English; sexuality, marriage, and family; fine arts; environment and resources; recreation and leisure; pharmacy; sociology; peace and conflict; speech communication; recreation and business; French; international development; optometry; and anthropology. In Experiment 1, 25 non-STEM men participated to be a third control group, but were excluded prior to analysis due to low number (22, applying exclusion criteria).