Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 16;13(2):257–265. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00939.1

Table 3.

Association Between Application Factors and Matching in Top 5 Choices for Residency Programs Analyzed Using Simple Logistic Regression

Covariatesa Matched Below Top 5 Programs (N = 597), n (%) Matched in Top 5 Programs (N = 3881), n (%) OR (95% CI) P Value
Received honors during third-year obstetrics and gynecology clerkship 302 (51.8) 2147 (58.1) 1.29 (1.08–1.54) .005
Couples matched 86 (14.6) 335 (8.7) 0.56 (0.43–0.72) < .001
Number of applications sent
 1–30 194 (50.3) 1543 (58.0) REF .004
 More than 30 192 (49.7) 1116 (42.0) 0.73 (0.59–0.91)
Number of interview invites received
 1–10 118 (22.4) 1184 (33.3) REF < .001
 More than 10 408 (77.6) 2376 (66.7) 0.58 (0.47–0.72)
Number of interviews attended
 1–10 27 (14.8) 667 (39.0) REF < .001
 More than 10 156 (85.3) 1044 (61.0) 0.27 (0.18–0.41)

Note: Values reported as N (% of respondents to an individual survey item). Odds ratios refer to the likelihood of a resident respondent reporting to have matched in their top 5 choice programs.

a 

The association between race/ethnicity, gender, and Step 1 scores and matching in the applicant's top 5 choices for residency programs was analyzed and were found to be nonsignificant.