Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Feb 27;221:108646. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108646

Table 2.

Mixed Effects Generalized Linear Models Estimating the Adjusted Effect of Intervention on Number of Self-Reported SSTIs, Total Number of Injections, Number of Uncleaned Skin Injections, and The Relative Frequency of Injections without Skin Cleaning.a


Model Outcome IRR/exp(b)b 95% CIc z (p =)c

# Self Reported SSTIsd 0.65 (0.35; 1.22) −1.34 (.179)
Total # of Injectionsd 0.61 (0.36; 1.02) −1.90 (.058)
# of Uncleaned Skin Injectionsd 0.34 (0.20; 0.60) −3.78 (<.001)
Relative Frequency of Skin Cleaning when IDUe 1.82 (0.77; 4.39) 1.36 (.173)
a

Covariates included in all models were indicator variables for month of assessment, number of infections reported in the year prior to baseline, years age, gender, race (White), ethnicity Latinx) and # of nights spent on the street or in a shelter during 3-months prior to baseline.

b

IRR reported for # self-reported SSTIs, total # of injections, # of uncleaned skin injections; exp(b) reported for relative frequency of skin cleaning when IDU

c

Confidence interval estimates and tests of significance were based on the robust Huber-White variance estimator.

d

Model specified with log link function and negative binomial error distribution. To adjust for time at risk the models also included log(number of days at risk during each assessment) as an offset with coefficient fixed to 1. The n was 213 persons observed on 669 occasions.

e

Operationally defined as ((times cleaned skin / total injections) * 100). Model specified a logit link function with binomial family error distribution. The n was 182 persons observed on 460 occasions.).