Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;6(1):e125. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000125

Table 1.

Characteristics of eligible studies

First author (publication year) Study design Study region Sample size Specimen type Enterococci prevalence, N (%) Enterococcus species isolated AST method Prevalence of VRE (%)
Adesida (2017) CS South-west, Western region 100 Stool 73 (73.0) E feacalis E faecium Disk diffusion 9 (13.80)
Ekuma (2016) CS South-west, Western region 319 Rectal swabs 13 (4.07) E faecium, E gallinarum, E casseliflavus Dilution/MIC, PCR 13 (4.07)
Ezeah (2019) CS South-east, Eastern region 1048 Urine, sputum, stool, aspirates, CSF, high vaginal swab, urethral, wound Nasa, ear and anal 68 (6.49) E faecalis and E avium Disk diffusion Method 21 (30.90)
Kunurya (2020) CS North-west, Northern region 114 Urine 8 (7.00) E faecalis Kirby Bauer Disk diffusion Method, and MIC 4 (50.00)
Ndubuisi (2017) CS North-central, Northern region 500 Stool, urine, wound swab, Environmental samples 102 (24.00) E faecalis E faecium, E Casseliflavus, E mundtii, E dispar, E shirae, E avium E gallinarum Kirby Bauer Disk diffusion Method 34 (33.33)
Olawale (2011) CS South-west, Western region 118 Blood, urine, wound swabs, sputum, and stool 7 (5.90) E faecalis E faecium Disk diffusion 3 (42.90)
Shettima (2019) CS North-east, Northern region 561 stool 561 (100%) E faecalis, E faecium, E casseliflavus, E hirae, E durans, E mundtii, E raffinosus, E dispar Dilution/MIC 6 (0.01)

AST = antibiotic susceptibility testing; VRE = vancomycin-resistant enterococci.