Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 2;51(5):713–720. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02133-0

Table 3.

Results of a logistic regression analysis

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis†
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Sex: Male 4.95 1.38 17.74 0.014 3.85 0.92 16.09 0.065
Age (years) ≥ 67 0.43 0.17 1.11 0.081 0.39 0.11 1.44 0.157
BMI ≥ 21 1.03 0.40 2.62 0.958
Section: Rb 1.71 0.64 4.55 0.283
NLR ≥ 2.4 4.80 1.52 15.15 0.007 3.42 0.73 16.00 0.119
LMR ≥ 5.3 0.53 0.20 1.40 0.199 2.90 0.62 13.58 0.175
Alb ≥ 4 0.39 0.15 1.01 0.051 0.29 0.07 1.16 0.081
Stoma: + 0.45 0.16 1.32 0.146 0.05 0.01 0.26 < 0.001
Drain: + 0.82 0.32 2.09 0.675
Operation time (min) ≥ 373 4.51 1.63 12.52 0.004 9.83 1.98 48.86 0.005
Blood loss (ml) ≥ 105 3.75 1.40 10.04 0.009 5.05 1.05 24.23 0.043
Tumor size (mm) ≥ 41 5.49 1.97 15.30 0.001 2.66 0.70 10.05 0.149
Laparotomy: + 3.68 1.09 12.38 0.035
UICC-T: (T3, T4) vs. (T0, Tis, T1, T2) 3.37 1.22 9.30 0.019
UICC-stage: (III, IV) vs. (0, I, II) 2.00 0.78 5.13 0.149
Lateral pelvis (mm) ≥ 142 1.24 0.49 3.15 0.648
Sacrum (mm) ≥ 129 2.81 1.09 7.26 0.033
Pelvic inlet (mm) ≥ 113 2.06 0.75 5.70 0.162 5.07 1.13 22.66 0.034
Pelvic outlet (mm) ≥ 91 1.65 0.65 4.20 0.293

†Variables were included in the Firth’s bias-reduced multiple logistic regression analysis with the stepwise AIC variable selection method when a p-value < 0.20 was observed in the univariate analysis

AIC Akaike’s Information Criterion, BMI body mass index, NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, LMR lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, Alb serum albumin, Tis tumor in situ, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval