Table 3.
Results of a logistic regression analysis
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis† | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Sex: Male | 4.95 | 1.38 | 17.74 | 0.014 | 3.85 | 0.92 | 16.09 | 0.065 |
| Age (years) ≥ 67 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 1.11 | 0.081 | 0.39 | 0.11 | 1.44 | 0.157 |
| BMI ≥ 21 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 2.62 | 0.958 | ||||
| Section: Rb | 1.71 | 0.64 | 4.55 | 0.283 | ||||
| NLR ≥ 2.4 | 4.80 | 1.52 | 15.15 | 0.007 | 3.42 | 0.73 | 16.00 | 0.119 |
| LMR ≥ 5.3 | 0.53 | 0.20 | 1.40 | 0.199 | 2.90 | 0.62 | 13.58 | 0.175 |
| Alb ≥ 4 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 1.01 | 0.051 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 1.16 | 0.081 |
| Stoma: + | 0.45 | 0.16 | 1.32 | 0.146 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.26 | < 0.001 |
| Drain: + | 0.82 | 0.32 | 2.09 | 0.675 | ||||
| Operation time (min) ≥ 373 | 4.51 | 1.63 | 12.52 | 0.004 | 9.83 | 1.98 | 48.86 | 0.005 |
| Blood loss (ml) ≥ 105 | 3.75 | 1.40 | 10.04 | 0.009 | 5.05 | 1.05 | 24.23 | 0.043 |
| Tumor size (mm) ≥ 41 | 5.49 | 1.97 | 15.30 | 0.001 | 2.66 | 0.70 | 10.05 | 0.149 |
| Laparotomy: + | 3.68 | 1.09 | 12.38 | 0.035 | ||||
| UICC-T: (T3, T4) vs. (T0, Tis, T1, T2) | 3.37 | 1.22 | 9.30 | 0.019 | ||||
| UICC-stage: (III, IV) vs. (0, I, II) | 2.00 | 0.78 | 5.13 | 0.149 | ||||
| Lateral pelvis (mm) ≥ 142 | 1.24 | 0.49 | 3.15 | 0.648 | ||||
| Sacrum (mm) ≥ 129 | 2.81 | 1.09 | 7.26 | 0.033 | ||||
| Pelvic inlet (mm) ≥ 113 | 2.06 | 0.75 | 5.70 | 0.162 | 5.07 | 1.13 | 22.66 | 0.034 |
| Pelvic outlet (mm) ≥ 91 | 1.65 | 0.65 | 4.20 | 0.293 | ||||
†Variables were included in the Firth’s bias-reduced multiple logistic regression analysis with the stepwise AIC variable selection method when a p-value < 0.20 was observed in the univariate analysis
AIC Akaike’s Information Criterion, BMI body mass index, NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, LMR lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, Alb serum albumin, Tis tumor in situ, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval