Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;12:2324. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22649-4

Fig. 3. Signal uptake leads to a shorter communication range in absorbing PlcR-PapR system.

Fig. 3

a Normalized YFP expression in signal receivers as a function of their distance to the producers in IPTG-inducible opp system and scoC knockout mutant (right, representative microscopy images). Signal producers in (a) do not express YFP. Gray lines show best fits (see “Methods”). b Communication range decreases for higher IPTG concentrations in the IPTG-inducible opp system (U=825,p=2.7×105) and decreases even further in the scoC knockout (U=648,p=1.5×104) (200 μM IPTG, n=24; 1000 μM IPTG, n=43; scoC, n=19; statistics show two-sided Mann–Whitney U tests without adjustments for multiple comparisons). c Representative microscopy images of differently sized clusters of signal producers. d Normalized YFP expression in isolated clusters of signal producers as a function of their half-width (blue dots), observed YFP expression (n=362 chambers). YFP levels are normalized to their maximal levels; black line, theoretical prediction based on the measured communication range (see “Methods”); vertical dashed line, the communication range of PlcR-PapR system. Enlarged data points 1–3 correspond to three co-occurring clusters of signal producers visualized in (e). e Observed (dots) and predicted (grid surface) YFP expression in chamber with three co-occurring clusters of signal-producing cells. f Communication range as a function of the cluster size for clusters wider than 3 μm (linear regression: intersect = 14.8±0.5μm(s.e.), slope = 0.04±0.01μm, p=0.0014,n=213 chambers). Microscopy images: blue bars = region of signal producers; red bars = region of signal receivers; yellow = signal response; scale bar = 10 μM. Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 1.