Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;21:341–356. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.03.016

Table 2.

Summary of VC enrichment via AEX

Sample Relative proportion, %
Fold VC enrichment Relative ratio (ECs:VCs) Relative ratio (heavier:intermediate capsids)
ECs
VCs
Lighter capsids Intermediate population Heavier capsids
AAV5-gfpa,b

66S 79S 95S
Affinity-purified AAV5 90.91 3.43 5.66 10:1 1.6:1
EC peak fraction 95.6 4.4 ND
VC peak fraction 19.81 14.69 65.50 (89S) 8.8× 1:4 4.4:1

AAV8-gfpa,b

63S 74S 84S
Affinity-purified AAV8 62.56 2.03 35.41 1.7:1 17.4:1
EC peak fraction 96.6 ND 3.4
VC peak fraction 3.13c 4.22 92.65 2.6× 1:31 22:1

AAV6-gfpd

Affinity-purified AAV6 63.17 36.83 1.7:1
EC peak fraction 93.28 6.72
VC peak fraction 5.36 94.64 2.6× 1:18

AAV6-cas9d

Affinity-purified AAV6 60.59 39.41 1.5:1
EC peak fraction 95.72 4.38
VC peak fraction 4.54 95.46 2.4× 1:21

AAV9-gfpd

Affinity-purified AAV9 67.63 32.37 2.1:1
EC peak fraction 94.96 5.04
VC peak fraction 5.28 94.72 2.9× 1:18

AEX, anion-exchange chromatography; EC, empty capsid; VC, vector capsid; ND, not detected.

a

Average value for multiple runs (n = 3), relative SD < ± 5%.

b

Values reported from sv-AUC analyses for determination of the relative proportion of ECs and VCs are based on 260 nm signal data.

c

No visible peak of AAV8 63S was observed in AUC profiles of VC fraction (Figures 4E and 5A). In the sample with a very low UV signal, a small peak at 63S was observed (e.g., Figure 5A, lot #2). Although not clear if it was the noise of the UV detection, as the absorbance was below 0.001, calculations were made based on the UV signal peak area at this 63S position so as not to exclude the possibility of the 63S population present in trace amount.

d

Values reported from the optical-density method for determination of the relative proportion of ECs and VCs.