TABLE 5.
The 10-fold cross-validation c-index (×100) from five survival models (GRS, LASSO, Ridge, RSF, DNN) using different p-value cut-offs in the AREDS and AREDS2 data
Number of predictors | GRSa | LASSO | Ridge | RSF | DNN | Time (minutes) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p <10−7 | 92 | 73.2 (1.6) | 72.4 (1.7) | 72.3 (1.7) | 68.5 (1.4) | 72.2 (1.8) | 49 |
p <10−6 | 165 | 73.2 (1.6) | 72.6 (1.5) | 72.6 (1.5) | 68.2 (1.3) | 72.6 (1.6) | 47 |
p <10−5 | 666 | 73.2 (1.6) | 74.4 (1.3) | 74.3 (1.3) | 70.1 (1.8) | 76.1 (1.2) | 62 |
p <10−4 | 1500 | 73.2 (1.6) | 75.2 (1.1) | 74.8 (1.0) | 71.1 (1.7) | 76.5 (1.4) | 77 |
Note: The last column shows the DNN’s computing time for running on the entire dataset once.
Abbreviations: AREDS, age-related eye disease studies; DNN, deep neural network; GRS, genetic risk score; RSF, random survival forest.
GRS is invariant to the choice of p-value cut-offs as it does not use individual SNPs but rather a composite score.