Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2020 Sep 24;39(30):4605–4620. doi: 10.1002/sim.8743

TABLE 5.

The 10-fold cross-validation c-index (×100) from five survival models (GRS, LASSO, Ridge, RSF, DNN) using different p-value cut-offs in the AREDS and AREDS2 data

Number of predictors GRSa LASSO Ridge RSF DNN Time (minutes)
p <10−7 92 73.2 (1.6) 72.4 (1.7) 72.3 (1.7) 68.5 (1.4) 72.2 (1.8) 49
p <10−6 165 73.2 (1.6) 72.6 (1.5) 72.6 (1.5) 68.2 (1.3) 72.6 (1.6) 47
p <10−5 666 73.2 (1.6) 74.4 (1.3) 74.3 (1.3) 70.1 (1.8) 76.1 (1.2) 62
p <10−4 1500 73.2 (1.6) 75.2 (1.1) 74.8 (1.0) 71.1 (1.7) 76.5 (1.4) 77

Note: The last column shows the DNN’s computing time for running on the entire dataset once.

Abbreviations: AREDS, age-related eye disease studies; DNN, deep neural network; GRS, genetic risk score; RSF, random survival forest.

a

GRS is invariant to the choice of p-value cut-offs as it does not use individual SNPs but rather a composite score.