Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Entomol. 2020 Jul 4;57(4):1141–1148. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa008

Table 2.

Responses of Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann and Ixodes scapularis Say nymphs when introduced onto nontreated human (forearm) skina

Tick species No. of ticks introduced onto the forearm at the 0 cm release mark Maximum distance traveled up the forearm over a 5-min period No. (%) of ticks remaining on the forearm after 1 min No. (%) of ticks remaining on the forearm after 5 min Location on the forearm where ticks dislodged
No. (%) of ticks moving <3 cm up the forearmb No. (%) of ticks moving 3–6 cm up the forearmc No. (%) of ticks moving >6 cm up the forearmd <3 cm up the forearm 3–6 cm up the forearm >6 cm up the forearm
Haemaphysalis longicornis 30 26 (86.7) 4 (13.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) N/Ae 27 (90.0) 3 (10.0) 0 (0)
Ixodes scapularis 30 7 (23.3) 7 (23.3) 16 (53.3) 30 (100) 30 (100) N/A N/A N/A
a

Following the protocol for the negative control (nontreated skin) in a bioassay for evaluation of tick repellents applied to human (forearm) skin as recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 2010).

b

On a repellent-treated forearm, these ticks would have failed to approach the edge of the repellent-treated skin at the 3-cm mark.

c

On a repellent-treated forearm, these ticks would have crossed into but not passed through the 3-cm wide repellent zone.

d

On a repellent-treated forearm, these ticks would have crossed into and passed through the 3-cm wide repellent zone.

e

N/A, not applicable.