Table 2.
Responses of Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann and Ixodes scapularis Say nymphs when introduced onto nontreated human (forearm) skina
Tick species | No. of ticks introduced onto the forearm at the 0 cm release mark | Maximum distance traveled up the forearm over a 5-min period | No. (%) of ticks remaining on the forearm after 1 min | No. (%) of ticks remaining on the forearm after 5 min | Location on the forearm where ticks dislodged | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. (%) of ticks moving <3 cm up the forearmb | No. (%) of ticks moving 3–6 cm up the forearmc | No. (%) of ticks moving >6 cm up the forearmd | <3 cm up the forearm | 3–6 cm up the forearm | >6 cm up the forearm | ||||
Haemaphysalis longicornis | 30 | 26 (86.7) | 4 (13.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | N/Ae | 27 (90.0) | 3 (10.0) | 0 (0) |
Ixodes scapularis | 30 | 7 (23.3) | 7 (23.3) | 16 (53.3) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Following the protocol for the negative control (nontreated skin) in a bioassay for evaluation of tick repellents applied to human (forearm) skin as recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 2010).
On a repellent-treated forearm, these ticks would have failed to approach the edge of the repellent-treated skin at the 3-cm mark.
On a repellent-treated forearm, these ticks would have crossed into but not passed through the 3-cm wide repellent zone.
On a repellent-treated forearm, these ticks would have crossed into and passed through the 3-cm wide repellent zone.
N/A, not applicable.