Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;104(3):254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.006

Table 1.

Characteristics of 86 patients who had telehealth visits for contraception during the Covid-19 pandemic in New York City and who responded to a survey, and a subset of 23 patients who participated in interviews.

Survey respondents (n = 86)
In-depth interview respondents (n = 23)
n % n %
Age
18–25 23 27 5 22
26–35 42 49 12 52
36–45 16 19 5 22
46 or older 5 6 1 4
Race
Black 28 33 9 39
White 10 12 2 9
Other 47 55 11 48
Asian 0 0 0 0
Missing 1 1 1 4
Ethnicity
Hispanic 48 56 13 57
Not Hispanic 37 43 10 44
Missing 1 1 0 0
Insurance status
Public insurance 51 59 13 57
Private insurance 35 41 10 44
Paritya
0 26 30 4 17
1 or 2 41 48 13 57
3 or more 18 22 6 26
Missing 1 1 0 0
Education
High school or less 28 33 6 26
Some college 28 33 9 39
Bachelor's degree 18 21 5 22
Graduate degree 10 12 3 13
Other 2 2 0 0
Marital status
Single/never married 42 49 13 57
Married/domestic partnership 37 43 9 39
Divorced or separated 6 7 1 4
Missing 1 1 0 0
Employment status
Employed full time 35 41 11 48
Employed part time 14 16 3 13
Out of work looking for work 11 13 4 17
Stay at home parent 9 11 3 13
Other 17 20 2 9
Contraceptive method used prior to visit
No method 24 27 5 22
IUD 29 34 8 35
Implant 19 22 8 35
Pill, patch, or ring 9 11 1 4
DMPA 3 4 0 0
Condoms 2 2 1 4
Difficulty accessing contraception in the last 5 years
Never 64 76 16 70
Sometimes 16 17 4 17
Often 3 3 1 4
All the time 3 3 2 9

DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; IUD, intrauterine device.

We conducted statistical analyses to compare groups, using the χ2, Fisher's exact or T test according to variable type and cell numbers. We did not find any statistically significant differences and do not show nonsignificant p values in this table.

aRefers to live children only.