Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;87(4):1717–1729. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14608

TABLE 1.

Summary characteristics of algorithm developments, external validations, and clinical utility assessments

Characteristic Algorithm development (n = 433) External validations (n = 481) Clinical utility assessments (n = 52)
Publication year, n (%)
2000 and before 7 (1.6)
2001 to 2005 12 (2.8) 3 (0.6) 2 (3.8)
2006 to 2010 75 (17.3) 81 (16.8) 12 (23.1)
2011 to 2015 175 (40.4) 224 (46.6) 18 (34.6)
`2016 to 2020 164 (37.9) 173 (36.0) 17 (32.7)
Sample size, median (range) 229 (18–10,673) 125 (28–2,181) 234 (10–2,343)
Participants (included), n (%)
≥5% white 186 (43.0) 205 (42.6) 36 (69.2)
≥5% Asian 210 (48.5) 277 (57.6) 17 (32.7)
≥5% black 121 (27.9) 115 (23.9) 16 (30.8)
≥5% mixed/other 77 (17.8) 62 (12.9) 2 (3.8)
Adults 422 (97.5) 455 (94.6) 49 (94.2)
Children 11 (2.5) 26 (5.4) 3 (5.8)
Location, n (%)
Africa a 2 (0.5) 2 (0.4)
Asia b 175 (40.4) 208 (43.2) 14 (26.9)
Europe 34 (7.9) 121 55 (11.4) 11 (21.2)
North America 136 (31.4) 121 (25.2) 25 (48.1)
South America 15 (3.5) 21 (4.4)
Middle East 30 (6.9) 25 (5.2) 2 (3.8)
Oceania 8 (1.7)
Multiple 41 (9.5) 41 (8.5)
Covariates included, n (%)
Clinical c only 87 (20.1) 49 (10.2) 11 (21.2)
Genetic only d 2 (0.5)
Clinical c and genetic 344 (79.4) 432 (89.8) 41 (78.8)
Application time, n (%)
Dose initiation 373 (86.1) 443 (92.1) 40 (76.9)
Dose revision 41 (9.5) 31 (6.4) 10 (19.2)
Both initiation and revision e 19 (4.4) 7 (1.5) 2 (3.8)
Modelling techniques, n (%)
Artificial neural network 32 (7.4) 2 (0.4) 1 (1.9)
Multiple linear regression 280 (64.7) 458 (95.2) 47 (90.4)
Nonlinear mixed effects f 14 (3.2) 7 (1.5) 3 (5.8)
Support vector regression 27 (6.2) 2 (0.4)
Other g 66 (15.2) 9 (1.9)
Unclear 10 (2.3) 3 (0.6) 1 (1.9)
Algorithm presentation, n (%)
Computer program h 10 (2.3) 4 (0.8) 4 (7.7)
Nomogram/table 9 (2.1) 3 (0.6)
Regression formula 239 (55.2) 453 (94.2) 47 (90.4)
None 175 (40.4) 21 (4.4) 1 (1.9)
a

Excludes Egypt, which is under Middle East.

b

Mostly China (131 algorithm developments, 120 external validations and 11 clinical utility assessments). This was followed by South Korea (16 algorithm developments, 59 external validations and 1 clinical utility assessment) and Japan (10 algorithm developments and 14 external validations).

c

Clinical includes clinical, demographic, and environmental variables.

d

Clinical factors also considered during the modelling.

e

All incorporate pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic techniques.

f

Used to fit pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic‐based algorithms.

g

See Table S6 for details.

h

Or online tool.