Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 6;12:618169. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.618169

Table 3.

Differences in the number of putative fungal functional groups (identified by FUNGuild “trophic level” annotations) in the rhizosphere of healthy and diseased cotton plants in two cultivars (LM28 and ZHM2).

Annotated LM28 ZHM2 Both
Sig. Odds ratio P Sig. Odds ratio P Sig. Odds ratio P
Undefined sap 433 143 0.54 <0.001 172 0.55 <0.001 178 0.62 <0.001
Plant path undefined sap 14 8 0.31 0.012 8 0.38 0.045 9 0.40 0.036
Dung sap undefined sap 5 4 0.22 0.035 4 0.27 0.062 4 0.32 0.090
Arbuscular mycorrhizal 71 5 2.52 0.035 9 1.73 0.140 12 1.51 0.215
Fungal parasite Undefined sap 133 52 0.45 <0.001 29 1.01 1.000 53 0.64 0.009
Endophyte fungal parasite plant path 9 5 0.32 0.048 5 0.39 0.152 5 0.46 0.178
Animal path endophyte Fungal parasite Plant path Wood sap 21 10 0.37 0.019 11 0.42 0.034 12 0.45 0.030
Endophyte Litter sap Soil sap undefined sap 39 15 0.46 0.020 19 0.45 0.009 20 0.50 0.014
Animal path Dung sap endophyte Epiphyte Plant sap Wood sap 19 10 0.34 0.008 12 0.35 0.008 12 0.40 0.022

Individual OTUs with significant differences in its abundance between diseased and healthy plants determined by DESeq2 analysis. Odds ratio of <1 indicates a higher proportion of OTUs in the particular fungal functional group in the microbiome of diseased samples, and P-value indicates whether the odds ratio differs significantly from 1.0. Only guilds with P ≤ 0.05 in any of the contrasts are shown.