Table 2.
Mean (SD), range | By metric | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall sum | Actual | ||||||
Possible | Actual | Possible | Careers | IRB | Pilot | P-value | |
All activities | 30 | 23.7 (6.6) 8–30 |
10 | 8.09 (2.6) 2.5–10 |
7.4 (2.9) 2–10 |
8.1 (2.5) 1–10 |
0.44 |
Clusters of activities** | |||||||
Creating metric result | 6 | 5.9 (0.3) 4–6 |
2 | 2.0 (0.0) - |
1.9 (0.3) 0–2 |
1.9 (0.1) 1–2 |
0.15 |
Understanding current performance | 6 | 5.5 (0.8) 3–6 |
2 | 1.8 (0.4) 0.5–2 |
1.8 (0.4) 1–2 |
1.8 (0.4) 0–2 |
0.96 |
Developing improvement plan | 9 | 6.4 (3.1) 0–9 |
3 | 2.3 (1.2) 0–3 |
1.9 (1.4) 0–3 |
2.3 (1.2) 0–3 |
0.05 |
Implementing improvement plan | 6 | 4.1 (2.1) 0–6 |
2 | 1.4 (0.9) 0–2 |
1.2 (0.9) 0–2 |
1.4 (0.8) 0–2 |
0.17 |
Documenting metric result and plan fully | 3 | 1.8 (1.2) 0–3 |
1 | 0.6 (0.5) 0–1 |
0.5 (0.5) 0–1 |
0.6 (0.5) 0–1 |
0.21 |
SD = Standard Deviation.
One hub did not respond.
Composition of clusters: (1) creating metric result entails data collection and computing metric according to operational guideline; (2) understanding metric result entails forecasting future performance or comparing results to any other data, and specifying underlying reasons with stakeholders; (3) developing improvement plan entails involving stakeholders, specifying actions, and prioritizing actions based on effectiveness or feasibility; (4) implementing the improvement plan entails reaching out to partners for help and starting implementation activities; (5) documenting includes entering metric result, describing underlying reasons, identifying partners, potential actions, and planned actions.