Table 6.
Results of testing for effects of hub engagement on completion of performance improvement activities (N = 30 hubs)
| Engagement category Coded from qualitative interviews |
N | Hub score (Mean, SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall sum (0–30) | By metric | ||||
| Careers (0–10) | IRB (0–10) | Pilots (0–10) | |||
| All active engagement: All participants report active engagement | 10 | 22.8 (2.28) | 8.1 (0.88) | 6.3 (0.93) | 8.3 (0.91)* |
| Mix: Each participant reports both active engagement and compliance approach | 4 | 22.8 (3.60) | 8.5 (1.40) | 6.0 (1.47) | 8.2 (1.44) |
| Mix: Leader reports active engagement; Implementer reports compliance approach | 12 | 23.1 (2.08) | 7.5 (0.81) | 8.0 (0.85) | 7.7 (0.83) |
| All compliance-based engagement: All participants report compliance approach (ref) | 4 | 17.0 (3.60) | 6.4 (1.40) | 5.3 (1.47) | 5.4 (1.44) |
Ref = reference group; SE = standard error.
*p ≤ 0.10.